The hand of Leonardo Da Vinci on all Jesuitic Churches.

 

After my post speculating on a link between a mysterious sketch by Leonardo Da Vinci appearing on the upper corner of a page kept in Venice and a possible connection with Saint Paul church of Macau [http://beyondthirtynine.com/was-san-paul-cathedral-in-macau-designed-by-leonardo-da-vinci/ ] further researches have uncovered fresh evidence supporting my hypothesis.

The façade of the Church of Madre de Deus of Macau (known as Saint Paul) was built between 1620 -1664(1) thought to be a direct evolution of the Chiesa del Gesù in Rome, the Mother church of the Jesuits. Similar churches are visible not only in Macau but also in Antwerp, Diu and Goa. The Chiesa del Gesù in Rome was built following the plans of Giacomo Barozzi known as Vignola (2), then Giacomo della Porta took over from Vignola in 1571 because of a change of mind of Cardinal A. Farnese.

Indeed the new design by Giacomo Della Porta(3) had an heavy influence on all type of façades of all Jesuitic churches, including Saint Paul of Macau. The closeness of Leonardo Da Vinci’s sketch is here even more obvious, more than with Macau’s Saint Paul, but this could be explained by the fact that the Macau’s façade was changed after the departure of Carlo Spinola to Japan.

We know that Carlo Spinola (the architect of Saint Paul in Macau) was in contact with Giacomo Della Porta, because Della Porta had worked not only in Rome and Milan but also in Genoa, the city where the Spinola’s family had its seat.

The problem was for me to connect Giacomo della Porta to Leonardo Da Vinci. The connection is indeed possible and it looks historically sound. The teacher of Giacomo della Porta was Cristoforo Solari (1468 – 1524) an architect close to Leonardo – Leonardo mentions Solari in the Codex Atlanticus- and as a matter of fact the Leicester Codex (bought by Lord Leicester in 1717 from Guglielmo Ghezzi) which then became known as Hammer Codex, and today as Bill Gates Codex (4) by Leonardo Da Vinci comes straigh from Guglielmo Della Porta (1515 – 1577) a sculptor and a relative of Giacomo della Porta. They were coming from the same small village of Porlezza, on the Lake of Lugano, right on the border between Italy and Switzerland. Ghezzi had noted on the cover of the Gates Codex that he had bought from Guglielmo della Porta: “I did pay him  as if it was made of gold.”  He had found it in Rome in 1690 inside a chest containing manuscripts and drawings by Guglielmo Della Porta(5)

It is therefore certain that Giacomo della Porta had seen several of Leonardo’s notebooks, not only the Gates Codex, including the drawings of the church kept at Venice’s Gallerie dell’Accademia.

The three architects who spread the Italian Renaissance style throughout Western Europe were Vignola, Sebastiano Serlio(6) and Palladio.

About Sebastiano Serlio we can make another contact with Leonardo. Benvenuto Cellini bought a codex by Leonardo Da Vinci in France from an ‘impoverished noble’. Cellini says in his memoirs that it was full of wondeful architectural and prospectic drawings and he had shown it to Sebastiano Serlio, who was writing a book on architecture. Serlio begged Cellini to borrow it to him but he never returned and lost it. Cellini buried him a second time writing that Sebastiano Serlio was able to undestand the drawing of Leonardo only up to a certain point, the point that his limited intelligence allowed him to.

Giorgio Vasari wrote in his biography of Guglielmo Della Porta that he was instructed by his uncle Jacopo to study ‘le cose di Leonardo’ the things of Leonardo, which presumably included manuscripts and drawings.(7)

 

 

 

 

1. César Guillén Nuñez Macau’s Church of Saint Paul. A Glimmer of the baroque in China. Hong Kong University Press, 2009.

2. Giacomo (or Jacopo) Barozzi (or Barocchio) da Vignola (often simply called Vignola) (1 October 1507 – 7 July 1573) was one of the great Italian architects of 16th century Mannerism. His two great masterpieces are the Villa Farnese at Caprarola and the Jesuits’ Church of the Gesù in Rome.

3. Giacomo della Porta (c. 1533 – 1602) was an Italian architect and sculptor, who worked on many important buildings in Rome, including St. Peter’s Basilica. He was born at Porlezza, Lombardy and died in Rome.

4. Bill Gates bought what was known then as Hammer Codex in 1994, for 31 millions of USD. Today he could resell it easily getting ten times that price. It is made up of 36 double leaves and it is mainly dealing with water currents, vortex and astronomy.

5. Giorgio Vasari ([1568], VII, p. 422 wrote that Guglielmo della Porta he copied “con molto studio … le cose di Lionardo da Vinci” copied with great care…the things of Leonardo Da Vinci. Guglielmo in 1531 moved to Genoa with his father.

6. Sebastiano Serlio (1475 – 1554) was an Italian mannerist architect who was part of the Italian team building the Fontainbleau Palace in France.

7. The Codex Leicester. Introduction by Carlo Pedretti to Christie’s Sale on 12 December 1980. p. 17.

 

 

 

 

 

Was Leonardo da Vinci the author of the marble bust “Lady with a Bunch of Flowers” kept at the Bargello Museum?

 

The portrait of Ginevra de’ Benci at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. – also known as The Lichtenstein Lady –  is considered the first portrait made by Leonardo da Vinci (1452 – 1519); there is a consensus among critics that he painted it when he was 22 years old.

It is a haunting, gloomy, picture possessing a magnetic spell, similar to that exerted by the Mona Lisa at the Louvre Museum. Once you stare into her sad face, you will never be able to forget her; she remains carved into your subconscious. It is a very small painting on a poplar wood panel (39×37 cm) but the lower part was sawn away for at least 8 inches. We don’t know why and we don’t know when. There is a garland painted in the back with the words Virtutem Format Decorat shows the mutilation. Probably she was keeping her hands close to her chest. There is a sketch of hands made by Leonardo in the Windsor Collection which could fit. But that is just guesswork, like for most of the things related to Leonardo da Vinci.  Tradition has that this is a portrait of the seventeen years old Ginevra de’ Benci, daughter of Amerigo de’ Benci, painted on the occasion of her marriage with Luigi di Bernardo di Lapo Niccolini, on 15 January 1474.

Ginevra died in 1520 and in her youth she was seen as a great beauty.  But is this really Ginevra de’ Benci’s portrait? We don’t know but most art critics think so, simply because at her back there is a Juniper tree, ginepro in Italian, therefore Ginevra. That is all.

It was bequeathed to the National Gallery by the Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund. Ailsa Mellon Bruce (1901 – 1969) was the daughter of Andrew W. Mellon (1855 – 1937)  a controversial financier who, after amassing a huge fortune during WW1 begun collecting old masters’ paintings. He then became Secretary of the Treasury  from 1921 to 1932 and U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom from 1932 until 1933.

In 1930 he was quick to seize a golden opportunity offered by Stalin’s stupidity. The Soviet dictator had ordered to the directors of the Hermitage Museum in Leningrad to raise cash by selling art. Mellon took home 21 incredible paintings paying what was for him a pittance:  Raphael’s Alba Madonna and Jan Van Eyck’s The Annunciation among them. In 1936 Mellon convinced President Roosevelt to build the National Gallery of Art and donated his collection to the American people, even financing and supervising the construction of the building.

In 1967 his daughter Ailsa Mellon Bruce purchased Leonardo da Vinci’s  Ginevra de’ Benci from the Princely House of Lichtenstein, paying  five million dollars for it. An hefty sum of money in those days, possibly the equivalent of 300 US millions today, but it was still a bargain. How this portrait got it into Lichtenstein in the first place I have not been able to find but in Lichtenstein they are regretting parting from such masterpiece. Up to the middle of the XIX century this picture was believed to have been painted by Lucas Cranach, Leonardo had used his fingers to smooth the face of Ginevra (if she is really Ginevra) where his fingerprints have  been detected.

When we look at the supposed portrait of Ginevra de Benci it is hard to believe that she was only seventeen years old and that she was a great beauty. If really this work was delivered by Leonardo on the date of her marriage then he should have begun painting her at least one year earlier, when she was only sixteen years old. But we know for a fact that Leonardo could not be pushed to work fast, not even by kings and princesses. Quite the contrary!

This lady looks like very mature and, furthermore, she seems like going to a funeral, more than going to her marriage. She has no jewels on her neck and carries a funereal black sash on her shoulders.

During the Renaissance  when an artist received a commission for a portrait he was not free to deliver something which would not please the sitter, like in our days Francis Bacon’s unflattering portrait of Queen Elisabeth. Vasari and other old biographers mention that he painted,  a wonderful portrait of Ginevra de’ Benci but it was then lost, like several other works by Leonardo, perhaps burned in the Bonfire of Vanities organized by Girolamo Savonarola.

We have strong reasons to think that this is certainly not the portrait of Ginevra de’ Benci but rather the portrait of Fioretta Gorini (1453 – 26 April 1478). Fioretta was the mistress of Giuliano de’ Medici, the brother of Lorenzo, who was murdered in 26 April 1478 during the Pazzi conspiracy.  Fioretta Gorini was by then pregnant and gave birth, one month after the violent death of her lover, to Giulio de’ Medici, the future’s pope Clement VII. The baby was baptized by Antonio da Sangallo, a close friend of Giuliano and then presented to Lorenzo de’ Medici, who accepted him into the Medici’s household.

At the Bargello Museum in Florence there is a marble bust attributed to Andrea del Verrocchio (1435 – 1488) – Leonardo da Vinci’s teacher – believed to be Fioretta Gorini. She is holding a bunch of flowers close to her chest (fioretti or fiorellini in Italian). We can notice here the same sombre, funereal, expression on the portrait of Ginevra de’ Benci at the National Gallery.

The likeness of this marble bust with Leonardo’s painting is just too great to be missed. It might also be that this marble bust was not sculptured by Verrocchio – its attribution is uncertain, like for most of Verrocchio’s works, with the exception of the the David and the Bartolomeo Colleoni equestrian monument in Venice, finally cast in 1496 by Leopardi

We believe  that this marble bust could well be the only sculpture in existence by Leonardo da Vinci. I am not the first to claim it (Hans Mackowsky, William Suida et al.) and I do believe  that there are strong supporting arguments.

It is clear to me that Leonardo da Vinci was painting the same woman represented in the marble bust, changing somehow her facial expression but keeping the same silken blouse and the same hairstyle. The slit in the bodice of the painting at the National Gallery had been badly over-painted, this is another indication that originally it was closer to the marble bust.

The sketch of the hands at Windsor, mentioned above, are often connected with the missing part of the Ginevra de’ Benci’s painting, but no one had thought the most logical solution to the riddle: that they were a preparatory sketch for the existing hands on Fioretta Gorini’s marble bust kept at the Bargello in Florence. The position of the right hand on the bust and left hand on the sketch seems a match.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A New Hypothesis on Leonardo’s Mona Lisa. Was She Fioretta Gorini?

The priest Antonio de Beatis kept a diary during his grand tour of Europe, which he started on 9 May 1517 together with his superior, Cardinal Luigi D’Aragona, a bastard with royal blood. The two men were back in Rome by January 1518. The reason of such a long absence from Rome is to be found in the fact the Cardinal was under suspicion of having been privy to a plot to kill Pope Leo X, organised by the Sienese Cardinal Alfonso Petrucci, who was arrested and strangled in St. Angelo’s Castle on 4 July 1517.
We don’t know much about Antonio de Beatis, not even his date of birth and death but we know that in 1519, when the Cardinal died, De Beatis moved back to his hometown, Molfetta.
He was a simple priest, a personal assistant and butler to the Cardinal who never thought about publishing his notes but, because of this, they were written with great candour. In 1521 he copied them down, correcting some mistakes and sent the two versions to Antonio Seripando (1494–1539) a jounger priest who had also been an assistant to Cardinal D’Aragona and who possibly did not even read them. The Cardinal was well known for having been a great lover of the arts, of the good life and beautiful women, thus we should think that the two travellers had some good time going around Europe, visiting historical places and meeting important people while in Austria, Germany, Holland, Belgium and France. They met Emperor Charles V a Middelburg, Jacob Fugger at Augusta and King Francis I at Rouen. They even sit in Leonardo Da Vinci’s workshop at Clos Lucè, in Amboise and on the way back they stop in Milan to admire the Last Supper which was already falling to pieces.
By 1873 the diary of De Beatis was still gathering dust on a shelf at the Vittorio Emanuele Library in Naples, where it was spotted by the German historian Ludwig von Pastor (1854-1925) who, understanding its great historical importance, published a first critical edition in 1905, collating the two versions available. Here is what De Beatis wrote on 10 October 1517 while meeting Messer Lunardo Vinci fiorentino…pictore in la età nostra ecc.mo. (the excellent painter of our age, mister Leonardo Vinci) who described to the awed visitors the three pictures hanging there:

…M.r Lunardo Vinci fiorentino, uecchio de più di LX anni, pictore in la età nostra ecellent.mo quale mostrò a s. Ill.ma tre quatri, uno di certa dona fiorentina facta di naturale facto ad istanza del quondam ma.co Jiuliano de Medici…

(Mr. Leonardo Vinci Florentine, older than LX years, excellent painter of our age, who did show to his highness three pictures, a portrait of a Florentine lady on demand of the defunct magnificent Julian de’ Medici…).

The portrait of the Florentine lady to which he is making reference is certainly the Mona Lisa but this utterance by Leonardo is causing us problems: in fact Monna Lisa di Antonio Maria di Noldo Gherardini del Giocondo, who was born on 15 June 1479 – the quintessential Mona Lisa – had nothing to do with the quondam Magnifico Giuliano, Leonardo’s patron Giuliano de’ Medici, Duke of Nemours, son of Lorenzo the Magnificent and brother of Pope Leo X, who had died on 1516 after having lived most of hi life in exile from Florence: from the 19 November 1494 to 1 September 1512.
The hypothesis first put forward by Carlo Pedretti and then developed by Roberto Zapper to explain Leonardo’s hinting to Giuliano de’ Medici is that the lady in the picture was Pacifica Brandani, one of his lovers and the only woman who gave him a son. Zapperi wrote a wonderful book in 2010 on this subject, entitled Farewell to Mona Lisa. Since was Leonardo who made a reference to Giuliano,  Zapperi is certain that he was referring to Pacifica Brandani, even if she was from Urbino, not Florence. Pacifica Brandani was the illegitimate daughter of Giovanni Antonio Brandani, one of the most powerful citizens of Urbino and she died at childbirth in 1511, delivering a boy, accepted in the Medici family with the name of Ippolito de’ Medici. According to Zapperi’s research, Giuliano then asked Leonardo to paint her portrait around 1515 as a memento for his son and at the same time he demanded his own portrait to Raphael. Ippolito, the son of Pacifica, became a Cardinal and a powerful man but died young, in 1535, certainly poisoned.

We would like now to present our own hypothesis which, strangely enough and despite its simplicity, had never been taken into consideration by scores of “monalisologists” writing on this contentious subject.
Are we really sure that when Leonardo Da Vinci says that the portrait they were admiring and representing a Florentine lady had been commissioned by Giuliano de’ Medici he was referring to Giuliano de’ Medici junior, the Duke of Nemours? This is something which had been blindly accepted by all Leonardo’s experts who had never taken into consideration the possibility that he was making a reference to his uncle, Giuliano de’ Medici di Piero, the brother of Lorenzo de’ Medici.
Giuliano had been murdered on Sunday 26 April 1478 while attending Holy Mass in the Cathedral of Santa Maria del Fiore, stabbed 19 times by Franceschino Pazzi and Bernardo di Bandino Baroncelli, acting with the support of the pope.
Our new interpretation, if true, could change our views on the Mona Lisa and open still unexplored paths. Lisa Gherardini del Giocondo and Pacifica Brandani were not born yet when Giuliano died and, almost exactly one month after the murder, a son was born to the dead Medici. On 26 May 1478 his posthumous son was baptised, receiving the name of Giulio, in the presence of Antonio da Sangallo, a friend of the defunct Giuliano who was following the instructions received by his brother, Lorenzo de’ Medici. In 1523 Giulio de’ Medici will be elected Pope with the name of Clement VII and Machiavelli will dedicate to him his book of the Istorie Fiorentine.
Who then was the mother of Giulio who died while delivering him into this world? Perhaps she had been the courtesan Fioretta Gorini (1453-1478) of whom close to nothing is known. Perhaps Giuliano when he knew that she was pregnant commissioned the paiting to Leonardo, by then a young and brilliant painter, but then seeing that he died first and then also Fioretta disappeared, he did not deliver it.
Further hints which could push back the date of this portrait is the fact that is on poplar wood which Leonardo used during his years in Florence but then switched to walnut in Milan.  Then the fact that there are no known preparatory drawings in Leonardo’s notebooks. But perhaps a preparatory drawing could be see in his famous View of the Valdinievole see also: http://beyondthirtynine.com/il-celebre-paesaggio-di-leonardo-da-vinci-del-5-agosto-1473-rappresenta-la-valdinievole/.

Last but not least also the latest discoveries of Pascal Cotte, who is seeing two different women under the surface of the Mona Lisa hanging at the Louvre Museum point to a earlier dating of this masterpiece. See also: http://beyondthirtynine.com/an-old-mona-lisa-beneath-the-visible-mona-lisa-according-to-the-bbc/.

But was Giuliano de’ Medici senior also called the Magnificent like his brother Lorenzo and his nephew Giuliano, the Duke of Nemours? Yes, he was!
We just have to look at a poem by Angelo Poliziano (1454-1494) Le Stanze de messer Angelo Poliziano cominciate per la giostra del Magnifico Giuliano di Pietro de’ Medici, an unfinished poem which was printed for the first time in 1484 and then again in 1498 by Aldo Manuzio in Venice. There Giuliano is also called Magnificent.
Therefore we may be right. Leonardo Da Vinci was perhaps referring to Giuliano de’ Medici senior while talking to his two Neapolitan guests and not to his nephew, Giuliano, the Duke of Nemours. Then, the Mona Lisa could have been painted, or sketched, 25 years before than previously thought, even before the Ginevra de’ Benci kept at the National Gallery in Washington.

 

THIS POST WAS FIRST PUBLISHED IN ITALIAN ON THE BLOG “LA NOSTRA STORIA” BY DINO MESSINA OF CORRIERE DELLA SERA.

13 GENNAIO 2016 | di Dino Messina

Una nuova ipotesi sulle origini della Gioconda di Leonardo

Di ANGELO PARATICO

Il chierico Antonio de Beatis tenne un diario durante il suo grande tour europeo, cominciato il 9 maggio 1517 in compagnia del proprio superiore, il cardinale Luigi D’Aragona, un bastardo di sangue reale. I due uomini rientrarono a Roma nel gennaio 1518 e il motivo per una così lunga assenza da parte del ricco e potente porporato va ricercata nel fatto che egli era sospettato d’essere stato a conoscenza d’una congiura, ordita dal cardinale senese Alfonso Petrucci, per assassinare papa Leone X. Il Petrucci fu arrestato assieme ad altri sospetti e poi strangolato in carcere, il 4 luglio 1517.

Una nuova ipotesi sull’origine della Gioconda di Leonardo

 

 

 

 

 

 

Italians in Macau and Hong Kong up to the year 2000.

Part of these notes were published on the book: ‘Five Centuries of Italians in Hong Kong and Macau. 1513 – 2013.’

 

Demand for Far Easter goods had been insatiable since the time of Julius Caesar. The Roman dictator had been the first to wear a silk toga and gave to his mistress, Servilia, a black pearl from the South Sea that he had paid a fabulous amount of money. In a way he was a fashion trend-setter and many other famous Romans imitated him. As a result Roman silver and gold flew east causing several fiscal crisis. Romans could only export glass, textiles, small metal works to balance the increasing deficit. The problem remain open until a only radical way to balance the budget was found by the British in the XVIII century. They did pay back with opium from India. A combined sea-land trade route to cut out some middlemen was found by Roman merchants in the second century A.D. but then it was abandoned.

There were several embassies sent by Roman emperors. Emperor Nero had always been fascinated by the East and dreamed about retiring there. Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius, in order to establish trade relations, sent embassies that reached China.
A thousand years later, because of the Mongols’ domination of most of the known world (they easily defeated Russian, German and Hungarian armies during the months of March and April 1241 and then entered Budapest). With them the gates of China were open and many travellers went East using the overland route. The Mongols captured scores of Christians during their European and Russian raids and appointed Genoese and Venetian traders as their agents for the slave trade. Once the Mongol empire vanished, the Persian and Arabs middlemen came back and prices soared. Demand for spices had always been great in Europe, pepper, nutmeg, cinnamon, liquorice, mustard and indigo and their cost very high. We should not forget drugs, there were several books written during the Renaissance about Chinese medicine and their curative properties, real and imagined. The allure to find a direct way to import them was enormous.
The Italian Renaissance had put into the hearts of the Europeans a new spirit, in their minds new ideas and, in their hands, new maps, new fighting techniques. They were a new kind of people which the imposing civilization of Ming’s China, anchored to an old tributary system, to bureaucratic regulations and very limited foreign contacts, did not know how to tackle. That put China to a great disadvantage.
A large number of Italians disembarked in South China over time: soldiers, sailors and clerics, travelling on their own or at the service of the Portuguese seaborne Empire which at that time was being built at an amazing speed, as C.R. Boxer put it: “It was this misture of deeper passionats-greed, wolfish, inexorable, insatiable, combined with religious passion, harsh, unassailable, death-dedicated that drove the Portuguese remorselessly on.”

In 1459 a Venetian friar, Mauro di San Michele ( ? – 1459) assembled a large parchment map of the world, adding a great number of notes and caveat, he was aided by other cartographers and travellers, like Andrea Bianco and Niccolò de’ Conti. It had been commissioned by King Alfonso V of Portugal. Some suggested that it was from that map the Portuguese got their idea of travel east. A second copy of his huge elliptical world-map, having about two meter in diameter, is kept in the Marciana library of Venice, while the first sent to Portugal has been lost, even if it was recorded until the eighteen century in the Portuguese monastery of Alcobaça.
Andrea Corsali (1487 – ?) remembered today mainly for having been the first traveller to describe – and having sketched – the constellation of the Southern Cross, wrote letters back to Giuliano de’ Medici in 1515 reporting about what the Portuguese were discovering. Corsali knew personally Leonardo da Vinci who, by the way, had a keen interest in the east, much more than in America. The presence of Corsali on a Portuguese vessel seems to point to a direct financial involvement by the House of Medici into the Portuguese venture on what was then known as “the spice route.” The Medici were most probably contributing to the financing that Portuguese explorations.
Corsali, in one of his letters famously said about the Chinese: “They are people of great skill, and on a par with ourselves.”
Giovanni da Empoli (1483 – 1518) a Florentine right hand man of Admiral Afonso de Albuquerque (1453 – 1515 was also impressed by the Chinese he met and said: “They are white, and dress similarly to Germans with kind of French shoes.” He then added that if he will not die too soon he would like to visit China. Giovanni da Empoli was an agent for the Florentine merchants house Gualtierotti & Frescobaldi and perhaps had been the first travelling banker in Asian history. He completed three trips to South-East Asia and joined Admiral Albuquerque’s expedition to Melaka. He was later dispatched to Sumatra. He then spent some time on that island before moving to China, where he reportedly died near Macau in 1518. So, at last his wish had been granted.

The Genoese brothers Ugolino and Vadino Vivaldi (? – 1291) given the impossibility of crossing Arab lands, decided to try sailing East by circumnavigating Africa, anticipating Vasco da Gama and the Portuguese by two centuries. Financed by Genoese merchants and noblemen, they set off in 1291 on two galleys, the Allegranza and the Sant’Antonio, with a crew of three hundred men. They made a stop at Majorca but were last seen along the coast of present-day Morocco; their subsequent fate is unknown. One of the brothers’ sons launched a search expedition but the two adventurers were never found. Subsequently several legends circulated about what may have happened, that was probably the source of inspiration for Dante Alighieri (1265 – 1321) when, in the Canto number XXVI of Hell, wrote about the fate of Ulysses.
Generally speaking Genoese sailors were not as lucky as they should have deserved: Christopher’s Columbus (1451 – 1506) sailed west hoping to get to China but instead struck into America.
Another Genoese, not as famous as the others, was Benedetto Scotto (? – 1640). A bizarre nobleman who wrote a treatise at the beginning of the XVII century in which he claimed that was possible to reach China going through the North Pole and then coming down from Japan.
Scotto mentioned in his book about a Continentis Australe after the Nova Ghinea who in his opinion was full of riches, huge and a sort of Garden of Eden. Information that he may have obtained from Corsali or from other explorers. This book was printed in Antwerp in 1618 and later in France. It seems that his vivid description spurred some to look for Australia, where the first landing was made by the Dutch explorer William Janszoon in 1606, and bolder expeditions were then made by the Dutch in 1623 and 1636.
Another Genovese explorer, named Paolo Centurioni (? – 1525) had proposed a land route to China to Basilius IV, Prince of Moscow (1503 – 1533) with an itinerary similar to the one followed today by the Tran Siberian railway. British King Henry VIII (1491 – 1547) also toyed with this idea, since the maritime route was a Portuguese monopoly, so much so that he invited Paolo Centurioni to London, but unluckily the Genoese got sick and died there.
Vasco Da Gama (1460 – 1524) reached Calicut in 1498 and there heard stories of pale faced, bearded men, travelling on big ships and called Chin. That was probably the lingering impressions left by the fleet of Chinese Admiral Zheng He (1371 – 1433).
Dom Francisco de Almeida (1450 – 1510) had defeated a Muslim fleet at Diu, on 3rd of February, 1509 on the west coast of India. The Venetian were allied of the Arabs and the Persians because they were losing their monopoly to the Portuguese, that were cutting out all the middlemen. The Mameluks, with technical assistance from the Venetians, had disassembled ships in Alexandria of Egypt and reassembled them on the Red Sea to move against the Portuguese, but their superiority in guns and seamanship made the difference. That was the beginning of an annus horribilis for Venice. The League of Cambrai composed by all the European powers with the exception of England and Hungary took arms against them and invaded Venetian territory. During the spring of 1509 a mainly French army invaded their territory and on 14th May 1509 defeated a Venetian mercenary force. That was the end for the Republic of San Mark. They lost the cities of Bergamo, Brescia, Verona Vicenza and Padua. Their conquests of eight centuries were lost in a single day, as a gloating Nicolò Machiavelli noted.

The first Portuguese and Chinese ships met in Melaka in 1511. Visiting Arab merchants, who saw their trade in grave danger and jealous of the newly arrived, convinced the Sultan of Melaka to attack them. Many were killed or captured but some escaped and the new viceroy Afonso de Albuquerque (1453 – 1515) returned with 18 warships and declined the offer by the Chinese merchants to assist him, he stormed the fortress and took possession of the city.
Ludovico di Varthema (1470 – 1517) was born in Bologna. Thirsting for adventure, he left Venice in 1502 for a distant journey to Siam, present-day Thailand, and Malaysia, enrolling in the Portuguese garrison as an officer. He was later knighted by Admiral Francisco D’Almeida. On his wonderful journey, which he described in his book Itinerario de Ludovico di Varthema, Bolognese published in Rome in 1510, describe all his travels from the Holy Land to the Far East. During a part of his trip from Chittagong he was together with a Persian and two Chinese Christians, probably Nestorians. He staid in Java and Melaka, and he further reported that at Calicut he met two skilful gunners from Milan, deserters of the Portuguese at the service of the local king. An earlier case of technology transfer…it was the month of August 1505. Here is the chapter of his book, in the vivid translation made by John Winter Jones in 1863:

Being then arrived in Calicut on our return, as I have shortly before written, we found two Christians who were Milanese. One was called Ioan-Maria, and the other Pietro Antonio, who had arrived from Portugal with the ships of the Portuguese, and had come to purchase jewels on the part of the king. And when they had arrived in Cochin they fled to Calicut. Truly I had never had greater pleasure than in seeing these two Christians. They and I went naked after the custom of the country. I asked them if they were Christians. Ioan-Maria answered: “Yes, truly we are.” And then Pietro Antonio asked me if I was a Christian. I answered: “Yes, God be praised.” Then he took me by the hand, and led me into his house. And when we had arrived at the house, we began to embrace and kiss each other, and to weep. Truly, I could not speak like a Christian: it appeared as though my tongue was large and hampered, for I had been four years without speaking with Christians. The night following I remained with them; and neither of them, not could I, either eat or sleep for the great joy we had. You may imagine that we could have wished that that night might have lasted for a year, that we may talk together with various things, amongst which I asked them if they were friends of the king of Calicut. They replied that they were his chief men, and they spoke with him every day. I asked them also what their intention was. They told me that they would willing have returned to their country, but they did not know by what way. I answered them: “Return by the way you came.” They say that was not possible, because they had escaped from the Portuguese, and that the King of Calicut had obliged them to make a great quantity of artillery against their will, and on this account they did not wish to return to that route; and they said that they expected the fleet of the King of Portugal very soon. I answered them, that if God granted me so much grace that I might be able to escape to Cananor when the fleet had arrived, I would so act that the captain of the Christians should pardon them; and I told them that it was not possible to for them to escape by any other way, because it was known through many nations that they made artillery. And many kings had wished to have them into their hands on account of their skill, and therefore it was not possible to escape in any other manner. And you must know that they had made between four and five hundred pieces of ordnance large and small, so that they had great fear of the Portuguese; and in truth there was reason to be afraid, for they not only did make the artillery themselves but they thought the pagans to make it; they told me moreover, that they had also thought fifteen servants of the king to fire spingarde. And during the time I was here, they gave to a pagan the design and form of a mortar, which weighted one hundred and five cantara and was made of metal. There was also a Jew here who had built a beautiful galley, and had made four mortars of iron. The said Jew going to wash himself in a pond of water was drowned. Let us return to the said Christians: God knows what I said to them, exhorting them not to commit such an act against Christians. Piero Antonio wept incessantly, and Joan Maria said it was the same to him whether he died in Calicut or in Rome and that God had ordained what was to be.

Very little is known of those first contacts. Few written reports are available and all are incomplete. The first European to actually land on the Chinese Continent was perhaps Admiral Raffaele Perestrello in 1515. His family originated from the Italian city of Piacenza. Raffaele Perestrello was dispatched from India to secure trading relations with the Chinese. He then used a ship sailing from Melaka, landing on the southern shores of Guangdong; he traded some goods and then left. He made a further trip to China in 1517. His ancestor, Filippone Perestrello, moved to Portugal in 1385 with his wife, Catherine Sforza, they lived in Porto and then in Lisbon. Filipa Moniz Perestrello, cousin of Perestrello, married Christopher Columbus. Perestrello had already proven his ability to conduct commercial expeditions by sailing to the Andaman Islands of Bengal, Sumatra and Melaka, always serving as captain under the Portuguese Admiral Afonso de Albuquerque. In fact, his glowing reports on the potentiality of trade with China’s, were the main cause that motivated Tomé Pires (1465 – 1524?) and Fernão Peres de Andreade (? – 1523) to carry out a diplomatic missions to China. Despite the tragic failure of their diplomatic endeavour, in 1521 and 1522 the Portuguese traders obtained the right to anchor ships in Tuen Mun (now within Hong Kong’s territory) and Macau, a small peninsula where the Portuguese settled in 1535, and received official permission of residence from the Chinese authorities in 1557.

Portuguese captain Jorge Álvares (? – 1521) was the first European to land on a Chinese island where on a chartered Burmese vessel disembarked on Lintin Island in May 1513. Others, like the Polo family, had left but not arrived through the South China sea.
That is a large island known today as Nei Lingting, it is very close to Hong Kong but under the prefecture of Zhuhai. For the best view of it we should hike up to the top of Castle Peak in the New Territories. Some Italians may have been there with him. In 1514 again he landed at Tuen Mun, which is today part of Hong Kong. In 1517 he went up to Guangzhou where he made a great gaffe by firing cannon shot when he dropped anchor in the port. The Chinese were outraged by such effrontery. He explained that it was just a salute and that he had seen Chinese ships in Melaka doing the same. This explanation further worried the local authorities, because private trade had been absolutely forbidden by the Ming emperor, even if it was illegally flourishing. Further to this, the Sultan of Melaka, who the Portuguese had deposed, was actually a loyal Ming tributary. The Ming had long abandoned control of the sea and this can explain why the Portuguese were able to fill the vacuum so easily.

Francesco Carletti (1573 – 1636) and his father, Antonio, disembarked in Macau from Japan in 1598. They were also from Florence and Francesco is remembered as the first man who travelled around the world by securing his passages as needed. While in Macau, the two men encountered the Jesuit Alessandro Valignano. Francesco’s father fell ill, died and was buried in Macau but to raise his sinking spirits Francesco had an unexpected encounter with an old childhood friend from Florence: Orazio Neretti, whom Francesco happened to spot disembarking from a ship coming from Goa. Neretti had missed his connecting ship to Japan. A stroke of luck because that ship, with her cargo of porcelain, silk and tea, with her entire crew disappeared without a trace.
In 1695, during a pleasure trip around the world, Giovanni Francesco Gemelli Careri (1651 – 1725) a Neapolitan nobleman, also sailed through Macau. Upon his return to Naples in 1700, he published his diaries, which recounted his journeys around the world.
Gemelli Careri has been cited by some as the first real tourist visiting Asia because his travels were not driven by commercial, religious, diplomatic or military goals. A full two chapters of his books focused on the history and commerce in Macau. It is believed that the Jesuits suspected him of being a popish spy, secretly sent by the Pope, and thus they did everything in their power to please him. They escorted him to Beijing introducing him to Emperor Kangxi, even allowing him to tour the Great Wall and other monuments. While in Beijing, Gemelli Careri saw a number of Chinese maps, erroneously contributing to the legend that Matteo Ricci had put China at the centre of the world. Gemelli Careri’s diaries were greatly influential in his time and, one hundred and fifty years later, inspired Jules Verne in his Around the World in Eighty Days. Below is an entry from his Macau journal, dated 9 August 1695:

I went to see a play acted upon after the Chinese manner, it was represented at the cost of some of the neighbours for their diversion in the middle of a small square. There was a large stage to contain 30 persons, men and women actors, and I understand it not, because they spoke mandarin, a Court language, yet I perceived the manner of it, and that they acted a lively manner and with great skill. It was partly recited and partly sung, the music of several instruments of wood and brass harmoniously answered the voice of the singer. They were all well enough clad, their garments adorned with gold, which they changed often. The play lasted 10 hours, ending by candle light. When an act is done, the players sit down to eat, and very often the audience does the same.

In 1784, Tuscan Admiral Alessandro Malaspina (1754 – 1810) sailed through Macau, commanding the Spanish ship Asunción. He returned to Macau in later years, finally falling into disgrace as a result of conspiracies at the Court of Madrid.
Carlo Vidua (1785 – 1830) was a naturalist, bibliophile and explorer from Casale Monferrato, he visited Macau in 1829, but then tragically died the following year, because of injuries and burns due to his fall into a volcano, in the Indonesian archipelago.

The Birth of Hong Kong in 1841.
The imperial government in Beijing always considered Macau and Hong Kong like periferical extensions of its vast empire. It regarded the two territories as outgrowths of Guangzhou – remote lands, part of the southern border, uncultured and not civilized – but, as such, suitable for maintaining commercial relations with the western barbarians, keeping them at a safe distance in order to avoid contamination. It is no coincidence that one of the two ideograms representing the city of Macau is a door.
Giuseppe Garibaldi reached Hong Kong and Macau in 1852, he was the captain of the Peruvian cargo ship Carmen. A wanted man, he was sailing under the false name of Giuseppe Pane. He shuttled between Macau, Hong Kong, Guangzhou and Xiamen for a few weeks before returning to South America. Nino Bixio, his lieutenant, did not make it to Hong Kong with his beautiful steamship, the Maddaloni. He had intended to establish a trading company in Hong Kong and Singapore, but died of typhoid fever in the Sunda Islands part of the Malay Archipelago before he could carry out his business plan.
When Hong Kong was established, in 1841, almost immediately the core of Europe’s presence in China shifted to the new territory. Macau did not fully recover from that blow.
It was only during the Japanese occupation of Hong Kong, from late 1941 to 1945, that Macau became again a focal point of relative peace and a sort of safe haven. In fact, despite its reduced size, Macau provided shelter to eight-hundred thousand refugees, including some Italians. At tremendous cost and risk, Portuguese authorities managed to provide enough rice to feed most of them.
While as a country Italy is only twenty years younger than Hong Kong, if one considers Italy as the peninsula where people share a similar language and history, then it can be dated well before Macau’s founding. Italian priests were already in Hong Kong at that time, as it is discussed in a separate chapter of this book.
Vittorio Arminjon, captain of the steam powered frigate Magenta, and the Chinese plenipotentiary appointed by the emperor, Than, signed the treaty in Beijing. It was a major coup for the Italian commander to have placed Italy at the same diplomatic level as countries such as Great Britain and France. This was the beginning of diplomatic ties between the newly founded kingdom of Italy and Imperial China sealed with a treaty dated 26 October 1866, ratified in Italy into Law no. 4406 of 23 May 1868. Article no. 11 in which it is stated that:

In these ports, Italians can trade with anybody, arrive and leave with their goods, build and rent houses, lease lands and build churches, hospitals and burial grounds.

Article no. 54, concerning favoured nations, is also noteworthy:

It is hereby expressly agreed that the Italian Government and its subjects will benefit, with full rights and in equal measure, from all the benefits, immunities and advantages which are, or will be, granted by His Majesty the Emperor of China to the Government and its subjects of any other Nation. Similarly, in the event that any of the European Powers should grant to China any useful concession, which will not be adverse to the interests of the Italian Government or its subjects, the Government of His Majesty the King will endeavour to adhere to the same concession.

The Magenta was on a scientific mission, circumnavigating the globe and on the way back from Beijing casted anchor in Hong Kong. Filippo de Filippi, possibly the most famous Italian naturalist of those days became ill and died in Hong Kong in January 1867. De Filippi, a native of Milan but teaching in Turin, introduced Darwinism to Italy, he was buried in the Catholic cemetery of Happy Valley, but his mortal remains were subsequently transferred back to Pisa, in Italy, where his daughter was living.
De Filippi’s assistant, professor Enrico Hillery Giglioli, published a diary about the trip titled Viaggio intorno al mondo della Regia Pirocorvetta Magenta. This publication was highly acclaimed. Below is a passage from an entry penned in Hong Kong:

Suddenly we turn over a cape; the channel widens and is filled with hundreds of boats of all shapes and sizes. In the background, instead of barren and steep rock, appears a magnificent city, which rises before us at the foot of a high mountain, the shining surfaces of its white buildings reflecting the rays of sun. That marvellous sight was Victoria, better known as Hong-Kong, the island’s real name. The Magenta reduces its speed and weaves its way through junks and boats; it arrives at the place reserved to warships and drops anchor not far from land, in front of the army dockyard. Completed the salute, we can finally admire Victoria’s breathtaking landscape; this city is reminiscent of Genoa, and vaguely of Gibraltar, as it unfolds like an amphitheatre over a sheer cliff, overlooking the sea. In front of us soars the city’s homonymous peak, its signal light – indicating arrivals and departures – placed at its summit, 555 meters above sea level. The mountain’s slopes are not bare: houses stretch along its base and over the conical hills surrounding it.

Tuscany was the birthplace of many renowned orientalists who then landed on the shores of Hong Kong: Antelmo Severini, Carlo Valenziani, Ludovico Nocentini, Carlo Puini. The Neapolitan Eugenio Zanoni Volpicelli was one was the best Italian Consuls in Hong Kong and Macau between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He was the author of several books on the China-Japan war and Chinese phonetics, history and gepolitic English. Domenico Antonio Mazzolani in his book Verso la Cina, published in 1915, portraits Volpicelli with these words:

I arrive at Commander Volpicelli’s office just after ten. He is surprised to see me again; he enquires about Libya and, more specifically, about war. He says that our conquest has had very positive effects even in China, although our local commercial interests risk worsening.

According to Mazzolani, Volpicelli regrets that Italian steamships are no longer docking in Hong Kong.

Consul Volpicelli is a dangerous man from a doctor’s point of view; you need to remain constantly on the alert with him. He is a health fanatic and his reasoning requires attention. Every morning, he walks down from his house, situated almost at the top of the Peak. This daily routine and an almost vegetarian diet give him a physical agility rare for his age. Finally, we talk about our business. At that moment, his attendant brings him a business card: is Baron La Penna, Ambassador of Italy in Bangkok, heading to Japan. The Consul rises to meet him; it seems that the former has encountered some difficulties in finding the Consulate. The emblem is rather small and worn out but, thank heaven for our tricolour flag, which always saves the day.

In the early twentieth century, an Italian Far East Trading Company, owned by Giulio Badolo, was operating in Hong Kong. In 1900, Luigi Barzini (1874 – 1947) landed in Hong Kong enroute to Beijing, where he was going to report on the Boxer uprising. Italy had joined the fighting and sent three thousand and six hundred soldiers and seven warships. His articles were later collected into a book that went through several editions and that remains up to this day the most humane and accurate reporting on that terrible tragedy.
Barzini reported that there were twelve Italian residents in Hong Kong at that time, and then went to present his greetings to the Italian Consul, Commander Volpicelli. On 14 August 1900, Barzini reports the following, in his characteristically picturesque style.

Raising my eyes from my writing, through the open window I admire one of the most beautiful landscape human eyes could ever behold.
If what poets want us to believe – that is, that beauty has the power to inspire – is indeed true, I should be writing this letter in superhuman verses. Instead, my sole inspiration is to discard pen and paper, and lose myself completely in the most foolish – and hence, sweetest – of the contemplations: a selfless, empty contemplation. The hotel where I am currently staying is situated at the top of the Hong Kong Peak.
Hong Kong is built on an island, which, like all small islands situated in this corner of the world, consists in a single, steep and rocky mountain. At its feet, on the northern shores, lies the city. The mountain peak is Hong Kong’s Garden of Eden; up here, in this delightful retreat, Europeans come to nest, high above and far away from the heat and stench of the coast. Here, the mansions and hotels, form a separate hamlet, lush and immersed in greenery. The rock was transformed into a garden, with boulevards winding amongst meadows in bloom and bamboo and aloe bushes, and avenues cutting trough the pinkish rock, which resemble long, bleeding wounds.
All around, the sea opens below, the jagged coastline toothed by rocks, islets, peninsulas, like a Norwegian sea – a full scale geographical map, where only the meridians and latitudes are lacking. Indeed at sunset: the time of day that turns sailors soft-hearted. Since yesterday, however, I am no longer a seafarer, and hence feel nothing in my pericardium.
The route that brought me here is now lost before me, far away, to the south, in fiery mists. A large herd of islands raises the backs of a calm sea, glowing pink. They stand out like pieces of an endless setting; the closest are blue, then, further away, they become violet and grey and, finally, carnation pink. Several bizarre clouds light up at sunset: thin and straight strips of fire, they are the Archangels’ blazing swords, extended over the horizon. The wind traces ever-changing lines of cobalt on the sea’s surface. In the distance, a few streaks of smoke – a steamship – appear to float in the light. Near the coast, several sampans, their yellow sails reminiscent of bat’s wings, are approaching the bay. Endless peace, solemn silence.
From the other shore, the bay opens up between the island and the continent. China’s mountain ranges disappear in the purple haze. Downhill, in Hong Kong, in the shadow of the great Peak, the night has already fallen and the city starts to fill with lights. A shimmering crown stretches along the bay. On the water, light as air, hundreds of anchored ships, sampans, junks, ferries, steamboats and ferry-boats light their beams, and now reflect upon the calm water in zigzag movements. It seems as though a corner of this beautiful starry sky has fallen into the sea.
I feel suspended in the infinite. The electric lamps of the streets, yards and docks are unmoving stars amongst the softer lights of the windows and the nebula of thousand pale Chinese lanterns lighting the streets. The moving lamps of the rickshaws and of the wooden sedan chairs, born by coolies on their shoulders, remind me of the thousand shining lights that cross a burning piece of paper before it dies out.
This is all sublime, and largely compensates for the bitter disappointment of those who – like me – alighted in this first corner of China, thinking they had truly arrived in China.
Arriving in Hong Kong, after having visited those corners of emigrated China, known as Penang and Singapore, one lives the illusion of having stepped back in time. Just like that famous farmer, who, having bought a return ticket for the first time, he thought he was travelling “backwards” until he found himself back in his home village.
From the sea, Hong Kong resembles Genoa. Rows of European buildings scale the mountain on different levels in an eclectic medley of styles: English, Italian, Gothic and Renaissance; however, not even the slightest hint of an inclined roof or a single pagoda. Chinese architecture is banned.

The magic of Hong Kong must have cast its spell on him too, for he ends his paragraph saying:

The kindness of the people conspires with the divine beauty of the landscape. I must wait a few more days before heading north. Well, for the first time in my life, I find waiting to be a pleasant affair.

Guido Amedeo Vitale, from Tuscany, lived both in Macau and in Hong Kong. During the 55 days of the Boxer Rebellion (20 June–14 August 1900), he was locked inside the diplomatic compounds during the Siege of the International Legations in Beijing. He worked as translator for the Italian Embassy.
In 1910 Mario Appelius (1892 – 1946) from Arezzo disembarked in Hong Kong from Indochina; he had run away from home at the age of fifteen. He tried to earn his living in Hong Kong but was unsuccessful even if later wrote a number of successful books in which he idealized his vagabond life: Da Mozzo a scrittore; Asia gialla: Giava, Borneo, Indocina, Annam, Cambogia, Laos, Tonkino, Macau, Cina; La crisi del Budda and several others. He had a previous, albeit confused, knowledge of China because his grandfather had been a silk trader from Como, one of the first to set up a modern silk factory in Shanghai.
Edda Ciano Mussolini (1910 – 1995) whose husband, Gian Galeazzo Ciano (1903 – 1944) had been appointed Italian Consul in Shanghai between 1930 and 1933, travelled often to Hong Kong. It is reported that her friends obtained military information while playing bridge with the wives of British officials, then reporting them back to Rome. Fuelling the espionage theory, history books mention a certain Gino, habitué pool-player at the Hong Kong Hotel, who was in fact a secret agent working for the Japanese. A friendly Japanese barber working in the same hotel transformed himself into a Japanese captain following the invasion.
The de luxe Italian Ocean liners Conte Rosso and Conte Verde moved passengers between Genoa and Shanghai, going via Singapore and Hong Kong. They were strong competitors of the more basic P&O vessels. Before Italy entered the war on 10 June 1940, the two liners transported thousands of Jews who were fleeing to Shanghai from Europe with false visas to escape the Nazis.
Below is a report issued by the Italian Consulate of Guangzhou in 1941 regarding the situation of Italians living in Hong Kong:

The number of Italian residents is limited. The colony consists in a few food dealers, mosaic design layers and waiters working in hotels. It cannot be described as a wealthy colony, and it has no influence whatsoever on the economic and political life of our host Country. Our Italian missions, on the contrary, hold great power, particularly the Catholic Mission of the Pontifical Institute of Milan, which counts about 30,000 believers, and is led by an Italian Bishop, helped by Canossian Sisters and hard-working Salesians. Italian shipping in Hong Kong ranks only 12th place. Italian exports to Hong Kong exceed imports. Though our trade activity was severely affected by sanctions, it began to recover in 1937. Italian exports consist mostly of fabrics, silks, foodstuff, cement, quicksilver, etc. Based on the effects of the political contingencies on trade relations with foreign countries that China has enforced since 1937, we do not envisage a prosperous future for our trade.

Italian warships often visited the Hong Kong harbour. Italy had obtained concessions in Tianjin and Shanghai and this situation demanded a military presence. The armoured cruisers Trento, and several battleships Colleoni, Montecuccoli, Carlotto, Elba, Vettor Pisani, Fieramosca, Caboto and Lepanto all visited Hong Kong. Benito Albino Mussolini, son of Benito Mussolini and Ida Dalser, visited Hong Kong while serving on a warship Quarto.
In 1925, Neapolitan pilot Francesco De Pinedo (1890 – 1933) landed his Savoia S-16ter two-seater hydroplane he had nicknamed Gennariello in the Hong Kong harbour. Engineer Ernesto Campanelli from Oristano was his co-pilot. After Hong Kong, they flew to Shanghai, Japan and Australia and then back to Rome, landing on the Tiber River. It was a truly remarkable expedition, considering that their seaplane had an open cockpit and that their only onboard instrument was a compass.
Amleto Vespa, a mercenary and secret agent from L’Aquila, also travelled through Hong Kong. In his book Secret Agent of Japan, published in Great Britain and the United States, Vespa unveiled a series of dirty tricks that the Japanese generals were planning on China. The Japanese did not appreciate this coverage, and shot Vespa in Shanghai in 1941 as soon as they were able to lay their hands on him. Ilario Fiore wrote a biography of Vespa using the scarce information available to him.
During the Japanese occupation of Hong Kong, all Italian residents suffered considerable hardship. On 1 August 1942, the Italian Consul in Guangzhou reported:

The situation our civilian and missionary countrymen face in Hong Kong is dire.
The missionaries are too many, their numbers is high due to the influx of members of religious orders fleeing the mainland. Luckily there are only three civilians, two of which are here with their families. Beyond the current difficulties, which they try to face with bravery, our countrymen fear the uncertainty of the future and that ill-concealed hostility they see lurking in the eyes of the Colony’s new leaders [the Japanese]. The Mission’s financial situation is quite desperate. […] Monsignor Valtorta reports that the Mission may not draw, except temporarily and solely as a loan, from the funds sent by the Vatican, which are to be donated to charity or used to provide assistance to war prisoners, and not to maintain the Mission, as expressly stated by the Pope himself. Monsignor Valtorta, whom I found aged, emaciated and extremely nervous, has imposed stringent economic measures. He has set the maximum daily allowance for food for his missionaries to two Hong Kong Dollars per day. This amount, however, is far from sufficient for the purchase even just a daily ration of rice. Our Canossian Sisters face similar difficulties, and they are horrified at the thought of soon having to close their doors and leave behind over four hundred sheltered persons (invalids, blinds and children) to the mercy of God.
Only the Salesians did not request my assistance; indeed, their Father Superior told me that “luckily, they were in a very safe situation.”
The Japanese occupation of a number of their buildings did not cause them any inconvenience, and the careful administration for which their order is renowned, allows them to face the present crisis peacefully and without major concerns.
With regard to our three countrymen, Sasso Innocenzo, Lazzeri Sinibaldo and Guerci Giacomo, they managed to obtain permission to open and run a small but very decent trattoria, which they financed with the little cash they still had at their disposal. They scrape a living, waiting to recover their credits from hotels where they once worked or from the banks in which they deposited their funds. However, their situation is critical; I fear that if their claims remain unresolved, we will soon need to transfer them abroad.

WWII ended in Italy on April 29 1945, but Japan surrendered only on August 9th, 1945, then British forces were able to return to repossess their old colony. Prisoners of war were liberated and refugees from China and Macau returned to their half destroyed and impoverished houses. Americans intended to return Hong Kong to China but met with strong opposion from their British allies. Then, with the shifting power in the Far East, they did not push the matter, and wait how the struggle between the KMT (Kuomingtang of Chiang Kaishek) and the Communists would evolve. There were few Italians left, Oseo Acconci took a ferry in Macau back to Hong Kong and was met at the immigration by a stern British sergeant who knew him. He called on him to come forward and keeping his whip under his posed to him a puzzling question: “Acconci, you are Italian, right? if your government would have asked you to bomb us, would you have done that?”
Acconci replied: “Yes, of course!”
The sergeant then told him: “You are a brave man, Acconci, welcome back!”
The old colony gave another proof of his resilience springing back aided by a framework of good laws put in place by the British. In the early fifties, with the influx of capitals and men from Shanghai fleeing from the Communists, it became even more prosperous than it had been before the war.
Many famous Italian actors and directors visited Hong Kong, such as Federico Fellini – his niece still lives in Macau – Michelangelo Antonioni, Roberto Rossellini, Marcello Mastroianni and Sofia Loren – who had played the lead in Charlie Chaplin’s movie A Countess of Hong Kong alongside Marlon Brando.
Many renowned Italian conductors and soloists, such as Salvatore Accardo and Uto Ughi, also travelled to Hong Kong. Maestro Attilio Foa lived in Shanghai and then in Hong Kong. Mario Mio, a singer from Trieste, performed for three years at the Mistral, in Kowloon. The Acconci brothers are very famous in Asia, performing in a band known as the Soler. Paolo Borghese, the son of prince Junio Valerio Borghese, lived in Hong Kong for several years. A talented engineer, he designed many of the electrical infrastructures that supply energy to the city. Pietro Badoglio, grandson of General Badoglio, worked in Hong Kong in the clothing industry before his premature death.
After the Second World War, various Italian authors wrote about their visit to Hong Kong. Curzio Malaparte, an histrionic journalist and writer from Prato, who travelled through China. His journey was cut short, however, by an illness that later caused his death. He was so well cared by the Chinese that he decided to bequeath his villa in the isle of Capri to the People’s Republic of China, who still owns it
Several reporters for Italian newspapers travelled through Hong Kong and Macau: Goffredo Parise, Sergio Moravia and Enrico Emmanuelli, who titled his book, published in 1957, with the rhyme La Cina è vicina. Luigi Barzini Jr.; Renato Ferraro; Ilario Fiore; Carmen Lasorella and Tiziano Terzani, author of several books, including A Fortune-teller Told Me, partly set in Hong Kong: Terzani could often be found sitting at a table at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club, in what used to be the non-smoking room. Ennio Flaiano wrote a short story set in the Peninsula Hotel during a night of typhoon. Writer Vittorio G. Rossi set one of his books on sea travel, Festa delle lanterne (1960), in Hong Kong. Enzo Biagi visited Hong Kong and Macau several times, as journalist and as director of documentaries for the Italian television. Contemporary writer Cristina Cappa Legora lives in Hong Kong; she is the author of several fine art monographs and children’s books. Her latest one is: Storie della buonanotte per sogni coloratissimi, published in 2011. Marzia Orlandi is the author of Passaggio a sorpresa nel Porto dei Profumi, published in 2008. Paola Rondini wrote a detective story, I fiori di Hong Kong, 2010, also set in Hong Kong.
During the period that led to the Hong Kong’s handover to China (1 July 1997), in an effort to predict the British colony’s future, Hong Kong was a vastly discussed subject in Italy. But often analyses were influenced by the author’s political views. It was a chaotic time and a large number of Italian journalists were sent to cover the handover on location. Hence, they contributed to the practice later referred as “parachutes journalism”, a tongue-in-cheek term used to describe the practice of thrusting a correspondent into a geographical area to report on important historical events of which he knows close to nothing.

The Italian Chamber of Commerce is an institution increasingly successful representing the Italian business community. The Dante Alighieri Society of Hong Kong was already active in the ‘20 of the last century in Hong Kong, but closed down during the Second World War, it is a non profit organization which promotes Italian culture; the Hong Kong branch. It reopened in the ‘60, thanks to the commitment of Cav. Leo Li, now deceased. The Italian Women’s Association is a charity association which was chaired for several years by Anna Waung.

Eligio Oggionni every year organizes the annual Festa dell’Uva, which attracts an increasing number of participants who wish to spend one day in good company, eating good food and drinking good glass of wine. He had been also the founder of Scuola Alessandro Manzoni, which offer lessons for elementary and middle school students every Saturday morning.
Everything move fast in Hong Kong and Macau, everything changes quickly, rolls on, it is consumed, it is forgotten and, perhaps, this is as it should be because the old generation must leave space for the new generation.
I would like to remember here a few old friends who are no longer alive and cannot tell us their story. Angelo Pepe, one of the founder of the Italian Chamber of Commerce, a noble soul full of goodness and generosity. After him the presidency of the ICC was taken by Vincenzo Callà and Giovanni Orgera.
Luca Birindelli, a lawyer and a pioneer in Asia – his father was the famous Admiral of the Navy Gino Birindelli, gold medal in WWII. Franco di Vajo, from Varese, Hong Kong resided for more than twenty years and who was actively participating in and contributed to the life of the Italian community. Roberto Paggi, a visionary salesman and and industrialist, who saw the rise of China long before many other people. I apologize here for not mentioning all the others which would greatly deserve it.

The Diplomats

We are presenting for the first time a list with short biographies of the Italian Consular Representatives who took office in Hong Kong and Macau over the past years. Particular importance has been given to the representatives who served directly under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

This list is far from complete and it excludes individuals whose terms of office were shorter than one year (short regencies). Also some key information about some consuls are missing, we just hope that a more extensive and thorough research will be attempted in the future.
Nothing similar has ever been published before and because of its extraordinary historical value we have decided to include it in this volume, even if it is not complete.

Sometimes representatives were awarded consular patent letters for both Macau and Guangzhou, although residing in Hong Kong.
At the beginning of the 19th century, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies and the Kingdom of Sardinia had consular representations in both Guangzhou and Macau. Thomas Dent was nominated Consul of the Kingdom of Sardinia in 1816. In 1824, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies appointed two British citizens: Alexander Robertson and Antonio G. Daniele, residents of Guangzhou and Macau respectively. This office, which was granted to them more as a favour than as an honorary position, was also like a kind of commodity to be traded in that it allowed them to operate outside the monopoly of the East India Company. They did not actually hold any specific duty or responsibility towards the State that had appointed them and the mandate of their appointment was, therefore, rather vague. It is even likely that the merchants themselves had solicited these appointments at the courts of Turin and Naples, offering a fee in exchange. The office of Consul in some cases was granted as a form of protection. For example, Propaganda Fide’s Swiss missionary Theodore Joset was appointed Consul of the Kingdom of Sardinia for Macau in 1840, with an agreement with the Holy See in order to allow to Joset the possibility of bypassing a series of restrictions imposed on his ministry by the Portuguese authorities of Macau. Anyway it did not help much, because he was duly harassed, just because he had switched to Hong Kong.
In 1857, Camillo Benso of Cavour decided to reinforce the Sabaudian (Kingdom of Sardinia) consular network. Acting upon the advice of Riccardo Manca di Vallombrosa, who had just returned from a journey to Far East Asia, it was resolved that a consular office should be opened in Shanghai rather than in Guangzhou. James Hogg, a British silk merchant, was duly appointed. The nomination was officialized only three years later, on 31st May 1860. Hogg held his office until 1868, when Lorenzo Vignale, a real diplomat, was sent to Shanghai.
1861-63: John Dent – Consul of Italy
John Dent, of Dent & Co.
Dent & Company was among the most powerful hong (firms) in China, together with Jardine, Matheson & Co. (honorary consuls of Denmark) and Russell & Co.
John Dent (1821 – 1892) was the grandson of Lancelot Dent, the latter being the brother of Thomas Edward Dent, founder of this eponymous company; he had resigned from the company in 1831. Lancelot Dent was primarily an opium merchant. Imperial government official Lin Tse-hsu issued a warrant for his arrest which triggered the first Opium War. It is believed that Lancelot Dent inspired James Clavell when he created the character of Tyler Brock, in his famous 1966 novel Tai-Pan then in 1986 made into the movie produced by The De Laurentiis Entartainment, with Joan Chen and Bryan Brown.
John Dent settled in Hong Kong in 1858 with the title of Consul of the Kingdom of Sardinia. In 1861, at the birth of the Kingdom of Italy, he was automatically awarded the office of Consul of Italy. His headquarters were located where we find today the Gloucester Tower, in Central.

1863-67: Francis Chomley – Consul
Francis Chomley was an employee of Dent & Co. In 1865 he was one of the founders of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC).

1867-69: John Dent – Consul
In 1869, the Dent & Co. trading company, operating throughout Asia, went bankrupt in the wake of the collapse of The Over end, Gurney & Co., a discount bank based in London. The discount bank was known as the banker’s bank. Their competitor Jardine, Matheson & Co. learned of the disaster thanks to a scoop (their mail steamer carrying news from Calcutta arrived two hours earlier than the others) so they were able to rush to close their bank accounts and withdraw all their cash and silver bars before panic took hold of the Colony.
Dent & Co. was forced to shut its Hong Kong office and operate only by their headquarters in Shanghai but in a decidedly reduced scale of operation.

1869-72: M. William Keswick – Consul
William Keswick was born in 1834. Like the Jardine and the Dent families, he was of Scottish descent. His grandmother was the sister of William Jardine, the founder of Jardine, Matheson & Co. In 1870, he ceased dealing with opium and between 1874 and 1886 he became the major partner, or tai-pan, of Jardine, Matheson & Co. He was repeatedly elected member of the Hong Kong Legislative Council.

1872-75: John Samuel Gower – Consul
A partner of Jardine, Matheson & Co.

1875-79: Theophilus Gee Linstead – Consul
A former officer of the British Navy, Linstead was buried in the Protestant cemetery of Happy Valley, where his tombstone still stands. He was a partner at Hoggs & Co., whose founder had represented Italy in Shanghai. A staunch freemason, he was appointed District Grand Master. At that time, the Hong Kong Masonic Lodge was based in Zetland Road, in the Mid Levels. It still stands today, but on Kennedy Road N.1, while maintaining the original name of Zetland Hall.

1879-97: Domenico Musso – Consul General
A merchant from Palermo, he was already residing in Hong Kong for business reasons at the time of his appointment. Though his tombstone is still visible in the Catholic cemetery of Happy Valley, his remains have been moved to Italy. His son, Giuseppe Domenico Musso, wrote an extremely detailed book titled La Cina ed i cinesi: loro leggi e costumi, published in two tomes by Hoepli, Milan, in 1926. In 1886, Bernardino De Senna Fernandes was appointed Consul of Italy in Macau. He was a rich merchant and in 1891 he was awarded the title of Patron Member of the Associazione dei Benemeriti Italiani. His monument is still visible in the Jardim da Casa Garden of Macau.

1897-99: Ugo Nervegna – Consul
Merchant and owner of Nervegna & Co., located at 13 Praya Road Central, Hong Kong.

1899-1919: Eugenio Zanoni Volpicelli – Consul General
Eugenio Zanoni Volpicelli was the first professional diplomat sent from Italy. An interpreter, he acted as Consul between 1899 and 1901, when he was awarded letters patent as Consul General. Between 1916 and 1919 he resided permanently in Guangzhou. An excellent sinologist, he wrote several books translated into French and English: China-Japan War (1896); Pronunciation ancienne du Chinois (1898); Russia on the Pacific, and the Siberian Railway (1899). He also published several articles in important magazines of the time. For many years he was a true reference point for all Italians visiting China.

1919-20: Emilio Eles – Consul
In 1913 was Consul of Italy in Melbourne. In 1917 he made controversial plans, in agreement with the Australian Government, for the forced repatriation of Italian immigrants of military age to enrol them into the Italian army. A very dramatic story, not well known in Italy, but that could easily be made into a movie.
Following Elis’s departure from Hong Kong, between March 1920 and July 1921, Vice-Consuls Camillo Fumingly, Ugo Gonella (an architect who was admitted into the Architects Register of Hong Kong) and Ugo Galluzzi temporarily acted as Consuls. A certain Raul Galluzzi is documented as being employed by Sassoon & Co., but it is not known if he was in any way related to the Italian Consul.

1921-23: Luigi Petrucci – Consul
Luigi Petrucci was born in Grotte di Castro (Roma) in 1887. He earned a Law degree at the University of Rome in 1911. In 1914 he was nominated Attaché and assigned to Alexandria in Egypt. In 1918 he was assigned to Lugano, and in 1920 to Locarno, in Switzerland. Between July 1920 and February 1921 he was Consul General at Corfu. He was later assigned to Kobe (Japan), with the letters patent of Consul, and then to Hong Kong, where he acted as Consul. In 1923 he returned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In 1925 he was sent to Belgrade and in 1927 to Geneva, as Secretary of the Italian Delegation to the 45th session of the Council of the League of Nation. In 1929 he was moved to Warsaw and was later appointed Consul General in Ottawa in 1932.
Vice-Consul Giuseppe Biondelli acted as Consul between January and October 1923 he
was born at Pesaro in 1890. He earned a degree in Diplomatic-Consular Sciences at the University of Venice in 1919. He began his service at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1920, and was nominated Vice-Consul in 1921. In 1922 he was sent to Shanghai and in 1923 in Hong Kong where he acted as Consul General. He returned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1924, and was nominated Secretary of the Italian Delegation for the signing of the Pact of Locarno of 1925. In 1926, he was first sent to the Principality of Monaco and then nominated Secretary of the Italian Delegation to the 7th Assembly of the League of Nation in Geneva. In 1928 he was moved to Liverpool with the letters patent of Consul General, and then to Berlin in 1932 with the same position. In 1936 he was transferred to London.

1923-28: Stefano Carrara – Consul General
In 1912 Consul at Malta.
Former Ambassador of Santo Domingo, Mexico, Chicago and Damascus.
After Hong Kong he was nominated Consul at Gibraltar.
1928-29: Alfredo Baistrocchi – Consul General
Admiral of the navy Alfredo Baistrocchi was the grandfather of Massimo Baistrocchi, who was also Consul General of Hong Kong between 1988 and 1991. In July 1929, Arturo Maffei was nominated Consul General of Hong Kong. Maffei never took charge of his office, and in March 1930 Emilio Manfredi was nominated to that position in his stead. During the period of vacancy, Ugo Gonella, first, and Luigi de Dionigi, later, acted as Consuls.

1930-31: Emilio Manfredi – Consul General
Emilio Manfredi had previously served in Buenos Aires and Chicago.

1931-32: Raffaele Ferrajolo – Acting as Consul
A Chinese interpreter, acted as Consul for just over one year.

1932-36: Alberto Bianconi – Consul General
Alberto Bianconi was the author of an essay on the neutrality pact between the Soviet Union and Japan, published in 1941.

1936-37: Arturo Maffei – Acting as Consul
In 1920 he ad been consul at Aden.

1937-40: Gennaro Pagano di Melito – Acting as Consul
Captain of the Navy, Gennaro Pagano di Melito was decorated during WWI. He was a captain of the navy patrolling the Adriatic. He was also the author of several popular books before the WWII: La nave pirata (1933), Mine e spie and Il principe marinaro (1934). Consul in Shanghai until 1941, in 1943 refused to join the RSI (Italian Social Republic) and was interned by the Japanese. He died in mysterious circumstances in 1944 near Beijing, while prisoner of the Japanese Army.

1940-41: Herbert Ros – Acting as Consul
Interpreter acting as Consul until China declared war on Italy in December 1941. Author of the book It is so nice to remember. Recollections of an Italian Diplomat (New York, 1972).

THE WAR YEARS.
On 10 June 1940 Italy declared war on Great Britain and France. Italians in Hong Kong were promptly arrested by the British and sent to concentration camps in India. Only those who had managed to escape to Macau and China were able to avoid deportation. With the Japanese invasion, on the 8th of December 1941, however, the situation reversed. Between 1942 and 1950 the Italian diplomatic office in Hong Kong and Macau remained closed.

1950-54: Eric Vio – Consul General
Eric Vio was born in Fiume in 1910, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He earned a degree in medicine at the University of Rome in 1933, and in 1936 he left Europe for Japan with a research grant. In 1937 he moved to Shanghai, where he was a surgeon at the General Hospital. Between 1943 and 1945, he was interned by the Japanese in the province of Shandong. Between 1945 and 1974 he worked in Hong Kong, and then moved to South Africa and finally to Taitung (Taiwan), where he worked at the Mission Hospital. He wrote numerous poetry books in Italian, English and German and was also a fine oriental art collector. Pieces of his collection have been auctioned at Christie’s and Sotheby’s, selling at extremely high bids. He married the famous pianist Maria Grazia Taddei, who lived in Hong Kong for thirty years. She was born in 1918, and died in Rome in April 2011.

1953 – 1960 Giuliano Bertuccioli – Consul General
A fine Orientalist and one of the most renowned Italian sinologists, Giuliano Bertuccioli was born in 1923. He joined the diplomatic service in 1952 as interpreter at the Italian Embassy in Beijing. There exists an amusing account regarding his misinterpretation of the ruling against a fellow Italian, who had been sentenced to death by the Chinese authorities. Bertuccioli had wrongly translated that the prisoner had been acquitted, informing Rome by cable of the judgement. As Chinese authorities were about to fire on the condemned man, Bertuccioli confessed his mistake and the Chinese, not wanting him to lose face, overturned the sentence and set free the Italian man. Bertuccioli often recalled this mistranslation of his youth with great pleasure!
In 1953 he landed in Hong Kong as Vice-Consul and was later confirmed Consul. Bertuccioli was fluent in both Chinese and Japanese. Between 1960 and 1962, he was President of the Oriental Department of the Giorgio Cini Foundation in Venice. In 1962 he was sent to Tokyo, where he remained six years. He alternated diplomatic service and teaching. In 1966 he was Ambassador in South Korea, and then Vietnam and the Philippines. He wrote numerous books and articles on the Far East. Died in 2002.

1954-56: Guido Relli – Consul General
Guido Relli (his real name was Guido Kreglich) was from Trieste. At the outbreak of the First World War, at the age of 17 was by pure chance in Russia on a ship. Because he was an Austro-Hungarian citizen, he was interned in Siberia until the end of the conflict. There he learned to speak Russian, German, English and French fluently. This was the beginning of his relationship with Russia, which lasted for all his diplomatic career. He spent many years at the Embassy of Italy in Moscow as an interpreter, and personally witnessed numerous dramatic events, including the Stalin’s purges and the Axis Powers’ attack against the Soviet Union. Sergio Romano in an article dated 22 February 2006 for the Corriere della Sera wrote:

Guido Relli, an Italian diplomat, recounted his memories to Ferdinando Mezzetti in a book published by Greco e Greco (Fascio e Martello, 1997). He reported that Marshall Tuchacevskij visited the Italian Embassy in Moscow in 1936 to attend the projection of a movie on the military operations against the Negus’s army. He watched with extreme interest and congratulated the Ambassador and the Military Attaché. The relations cooled down, understandably, during the years of the Spanish civil war. In the summer of 1940, however, the Foreign Minister Molotov proposed to Italy a treaty in which the Black Sea would be divided between Italy and the Soviet Union, much like the treaty signed between the Soviet Union and Germany in August 1939 for Poland and the Baltic Sea. Such meetings and agreements were based on the assumption that Italy and the Soviet Union had valid economic and political issues to become partners. Although it might seem a paradox, it can perhaps be said that the two countries shared a mutual attraction. Left-wing Fascism expressed some sympathy for the USSR, while Moscow showed a certain curiosity for Mussolini’s regime.

Guido Relli’s book, to which Romano refers, reads like a novel because Relli led a peculiar and adventurous life. In 1946, he personally had the chance to protest with the American Secretary of State, James Byrnes, for the treatment reserved to his native city, Trieste. Byrnes answered: “My dear young man – Relli was 50 at that time – what you say is true, but you forget one thing. Our boys must absolutely come home after such a horrible war. All our decisions stem from this.”

1956-59: Adalberto Figarolo di Gropello – Consul General
He had been Ambassador in Afghanistan, Norway and Switzerland.

1959-60: Filippo Muzi Falconi – Consul General
Member of an old aristocratic family.

1960-63: Piero Guadagnini – Consul General
Piero Guadagnini was a great diplomat and a man of high culture and manners. Below, Sergio Romano, former Ambassador turned historian and columnist, explains how, in an interview he gave a few years ago, he decided to enter thye diplomatic service:

I was a journalist, and I had no intention of changing profession. But people have no control on their destiny. I met the Italian Consul General of Chicago, Piero Guadagnini, a man from whom I thought I should take example. He convinced me to take the diplomatic entry exam. I did, and I passed it.

1963-69: Luigi Bolla – Consul General
Luigi Bolla was born in Càrcare, Savona, in 1910. He began his diplomatic career in 1939, and was sent to Alexandria of Egypt, Biserta and then to Berlin. During the RSI (Social Republic of Italy) he was Secretary of Serafino Mazzolini, Deputy Foreign Minister. After WWII he was arrested and tried but freed. Though “purged” he was able to start again his diplomatic career in 1949. He was sent to Brazil, Egypt and Syria. His diary, Perché a Salò, diario della Repubblica Sociale Italiana, edited by Giordano Bruno Guerri, was published by Bompiani in 1982. It is a book of extreme historical worth, it explains how an anti-fascist, as he indeed he had been, could accept to collaborate with Mussolini’s regime to the very end.

1969-71: Marcello Mochi – Consul General
Marcello Mochi was head of the III Office of International Cultural Relations and was a renowned expert and collector of Chinese stamps
Author of A journey of an Italian diplomat around Saudi Arabia in 1941, reprinted in 2003, by Al-Turah, Ryad.

1971-76: Pio Saverio Pignatti Morano di Custoza – Consul General
Pignatti Morano di Custoza is a member of an aristocratic family from Modena, which provided, and is still providing, valid public servants to Italy. Their aristocratic motto is: “We are noble by deeds and not noble by birth.” Villa Pignatti was bought by tenor Luciano Pavarotti; his widow still lives there.
1976-80: Michelangelo Pisani Massamormile – Consul General
Michelangelo Pisani Massamormile was born in Naples. He is remembered as a man of great culture and exquisite civility. He had arrived in Hong Kong just over a week before the death of Mao Zedong. A lawyer, he was a pupil of the great criminal lawyer Alfredo De rsico. He served in Grenoble, Israel and hile, but Turkey was the country he most treasured. He is friend of the President of Italy, Giorgio Napolitano.

1980-84: Raffaele Berlenghi – Consul General
Raffaele Berlenghi was born in Milan in 1940. He earned a Law degree at the University of Milan in 1964, and joined the diplomatic service in 1965. After serving at the Directorate General for Emigration, Berlenghi was appointed to the Special Diplomatic Delegation for Disarmament, Geneva, in 1968. He then returned to Rome to serve with the Directorate General for Political Affairs, the Cabinet of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Directorate General for Personnel.
Between 1970 and 1972, he served as First Secretary to the Permanent Mission of Italy for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in Paris, and later as Consul in Bastia. In 1975, he was appointed Consul of Warsaw.
In 1978 he returned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where he was assigned to the Directorate General for Personnel and Administration. Between 1980 and 1984 he was Consul General in Hong Kong and, later, First Counselor to the Permanent Representation of Italy to NATO, Brussels. Then ambassador of Italy to Vienna.
He returned to Rome in 1988, where he served with the Directorate General for Personnel and Administration. In the same year, Berlenghi was promoted to Minister Plenipotentiary. In 1992, he was appointed Ambassador to Damascus. In 1997, he returned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where was assigned to the Internal Control Service. Since 2000, he has served as Chief of the Permanent Mission of Italy to the United Nations in Rome.

1984-88: Gabriele Menegatti – Consul General
Ambassador of Italy to Beijing.
Born in Bologna on 28 November 1939, Menegatti earned a Law degree at the University of Bologna in 1963, and joined the diplomatic service in 1965.
After serving with the Directorate General for Personnel, between 1968 and 1970 he was appointed Vice-Consul of Hong Kong, posted at the Italian Trade Commission Representation in Beijing, where, in 1971, he was appointed First Secretary. In 1972, he became First Secretary at the Permanent Mission of Italy to the United Nations, New York, and in 1975, served as Chargé d’Affaires ad interim in Hanoi, where he remained as Counselor until 1977.
Upon his return to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, he served with the Directorate General of Personnel and Administration until 1984, when he was appointed Consul General for Hong Kong. Between 1988 and 1990, he returned to the Directorate General of Personnel and Administration, and in 1990 he was appointed Ambassador to New Delhi.
In 1995, he became Chief of the Press and Institutional Communication Service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In 1996, Menegatti was appointed Interdirectional Coordinator for Asia and Oceania. In 1999 he was nominated Ambassador to Tokyo, and in 2001 he was promoted to the status of Ambassador of Grade 1.

1988-91: Massimo Baistrocchi – Consul General
Massimo Baistrocchi was the son of Ettore Baistrocchi, from Livorno, who was Consul in Japan. On 8 September 1943, Ettore Baistrocchi chose to side with the King and was interned with his family in a concentration camp in Japan until 1945. At that time, Massimo Baistrocchi was only 16 months old. Baistrocchi is the author of many books and articles, the last Ettore Baistrocchi, mio padre Rubbettino, 2008.
He died in Namibia on 22 January 2012 of a heart attack. Old residents remember him for his pipe, for his passions for Italian cuisine and painting, more than anything else.

1991-96: Folco De Luca Gabrielli – Consul General
Folco de Luca Gabrielli was born in Rome on 6 September 1947. He earned a Law degree at the University of Milan in April 1971. After passing the diplomatic entry exam, he served at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as Secretary of Legation in March 1975.
In 1977 he was assigned to the Private Secretary’s office of the Under-Secretary of State. In 1978 he was appointed Second Secretary for Social Affairs at the Permanent Representation of Italy to the International Organizations in Geneva, where he was promoted First Secretary of Legation in 1979.
He served as First Commercial Secretary in the Embassies of Italy at Kampala in 1981 and Teheran in 1983. He was promoted Counselor of Legation in 1984, and confirmed Commercial Counselor in Teheran until 1986.
After being promoted Embassy Counselor, he was nominated Consul General for Hong Kong and Macau on 26 October 1991. In August 1996 he was nominated Consul General for Los Angeles. In October 1999 he returned to Rome and in 2001 he was outposted to the Presidency of the Council of Ministers. In 2003 he was promoted Minister Plenipotentiary. He was Ambassador to Singapore between February 2005 and January 2010, when he was nominated Ambassador to Kuala Lumpur. In July 2012 he returned to Rome. He is currently serving at the General Inspector’s office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

1996-98: Alberto Bradanini – Consul General
Alberto Bradanini was born on 9 July 1950 in Rome, where he earned a Political Science degree in July 1974.
In August 1975 he joined the diplomatic service, with a specialisation in social services. In 1978 he was assigned to the General Headquarters for Emigration and Social Affairs, and in 1978 he was appointed Vice-Consul at Mons.
In 1980 he was promoted First Secretary of Legation and a year later he was assigned to Caracas. In 1983 he was transferred to Oslo, where he was confirmed Counselor of Legation two years later. He returned to Rome in 1986 to serve with the Directorate General of Personnel. He was promoted Embassy Counselor in January 1991, and, in August of the same year, First Commercial Counselor at the important Embassy of Italy to Beijing. In August 1996 he was nominated Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau. In February 1998, he was outplaced to the United Nations Office at Vienna, as Special Assistant of the General Director, and, from 1999, as Director of the UNICRI (United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute) at Turin. In 2003, he was promoted Minister Plenipotentiary. In January 2004 he was assigned to the General Director’s Office for the Mediterranean and Middle East Countries. On 15 April 2004, he was assigned to the General Directorate of Asia, Oceania, the Pacific and Antarctica, as Head of the Italy-China Governmental Committee.
After assisting the Director General for Multilateral Economic and Financial Co-operation, in January 2007 he worked temporarily at ENEL (Italian National Electricity Board). In August 2008, he was appointed Ambassador to Teheran, and in the summer of 2012 Ambassador to Beijing.

Leonardo Da Vinci, un misterioso sconosciuto.

Quali sono i libri di storia che hanno contribuito alla nostra formazione? Continuiamo la nostra serie con il contributo di Angelo Paratico dedicato alla biografia di Leonardo scritta da Serge Bramly.

Volendo suggerire una biografia dedicata a Leonardo Da Vinci, che sia allo stesso tempo di piacevole lettura, ben documentata e possa resistere al corrosivo scorrere degli anni, la mia scelta cade senz’altro sull’opera del francese Serge Bramly. Pubblicata in Francia nel 1981 – epoca remotissima per lo studio di Leonardo – è intitolata “Leonardo Da Vinci, Artista, scienziato, filosofo” e in Italia figura fra gli Oscar Mondatori.
La bibliografia riguardante Leonardo Da Vinci è imponente e in crescita esponenziale. Questo è vero anche senza prendere in considerazione tutta la letteratura fantastica che si va accumulando su di lui, che va dal libro d’un visionario come Dmitry S. Merezhkovsky con il suo “Il romanzo di Leonardo Da Vinci” del 1900 sino all’opera d’un analfabeta di confine com’è stato definito l’autore del “Da Vinci Code” che pure ha venduto duecento milioni di copie. Paul Valery, scrivendo di Leonardo nel 1894, disse che ciò che resta di un uomo sono i sogni che leghiamo al suo nome, questo è verissimo nel caso del grande ingegnere e artista fiorentino.
La ricerca storica riguardante colui che fu l’uomo più geniale e misterioso che sia mai esistito è ancora in corso e, per quanto possa sembrare strano ai non addetti ai lavori, siamo solo agli inizi della ricerca. Infatti, a differenza di altri personaggi storici per i quali prove e documenti sono noti e abbastanza conclusivi, nel caso di Leonardo è vero il contrario. Poco è definitivo e quasi nulla è certo; infatti nuovi documenti d’archivio creduti perduti affiorano in continuazione. Basti qui citare come esempio le ricerche condotte da Elisabetta Ulivi, una brillante docente di Storia della Matematiche presso l’università di Firenze, che ha pubblicato nel 2008 un rigoroso libretto intitolato “Per la Genealogia di Leonardo” con il frutto delle sue ricerche archivistiche. Le sue scoperte sono straordinarie, a iniziare dalle tracce di due fratellastri di Leonardo, come lui nati illegittimi da Ser Piero Da Vinci. Un altro esempio potrebbe essere la scoperta dei codici Madrid I e Madrid II avvenuta nel 1966: stavano da secoli al loro posto nella libreria di Stato spagnola ma erano stati inventariati in maniera errata. Se pensiamo che una metà, o addirittura due terzi, dei taccuini di Leonardo sono andati perduti capiamo allora che ci potrebbero essere nuove sorprese in futuro. Nuovi documenti potrebbero affiorare e cambiare, anche radicalmente, il suo quadro biografico.
Anche per quanto riguarda i dipinti di Leonardo Da Vinci, tutto sommato, si brancola nel buio. Gli unici a lui interamente attribuibili sono soltanto L’Ultima Cena di Milano – un’opera che ormai poco assomiglia all’originale – e la Gioconda, conservata al Louvre, forse il quadro più celebre al mondo ma sul quale le interpretazioni si sprecano.
Perché dunque prediligo l’opera biografica di un francese, quando in Italia abbiamo grandi studiosi di Leonardo, esperti del calibro di Carlo Pedretti, Alessandro Vezzosi, Carlo Vecce, Edoardo Villata, Agnese Sabato e tanti altri? Lo faccio perché Bramly è un grande scrittore e forse anche perché anche i francesi sentono Leonardo come uno di loro. Come è noto Leonardo morì in Francia il 2 maggio 1519 mentre stava al servizio del re di Francesco I di Valois, e Bramly accetta come plausibile la narrazione di Giorgio Vasari che vorrebbe Leonardo spirare fra le braccia di quel monarca. Francesco I era figlio di Luisa di Savoia, la quale era a sua volta sorella di Filiberta di Savoia, moglie di Giuliano de’ Medici, che era stato il mecenate di Leonardo sino alla sua prematura morte avvenuta a Firenze nel 1516.
Napoleone, da par suo, nel trafugare nel 1795 i codici leonardeschi conservati a Milano avrebbe affermato che tutti gli uomini di genio sono francesi, quasi a giustificarne la sottrazione e pare che prima di spedirli a Parigi li volle studiare di persona. Il pezzo forte, il Codice Atlantico, ritornò alla Ambrosiana dopo la sua caduta ma molti altri taccuini – deliziosi e importantissimi – sfuggirono agli emissari di Metternich e restarono a Parigi. Grazie a quella storica rapina è sorta una scuola di grandi leonardisti a Parigi e per questo motivo, da milanese quale sono, perdono Serge Bramly e apprezzo la sua bella biografia.

Angelo Paratico

An Easy Solution to the Problems Created by Parallel Traders

Recently we have seen awful images in Hong Kong, traditionally a tolerant and civilized city.  Common citizens were seen attacking and insulting parallel traders crossing the border from China. First a limit was imposed on the number of powder milk cans for infants a person may carry over the border, but then the buying spree extended to medicine, cosmetics, food in general, and even to luxury items. This situation has created a lot of inconvenience to Hong Kong citizens, already stressed out by the rising cost of houses because of speculative money flowing in from China.

Local residents feel under siege by this army of people moving around carrying trolleys, clogging shops and malls, shouting and pushing. The Hong Kong government has promised to discuss with the Chinese Government to limit the number of multi-entry permits issued to P.R.C.’s citizens. But it seems to me that there is an actor missing from such raging debate: the missing side is the China Customs and Excise Offices at the border crossings.There is always a limit to the quantity of goods that a private citizen might carry back from trips abroad and for all the goods in excess duties should be paid. China is not a tax free Country and if a person entering with goods worth more than a certain limited amount, by law, he or she, needs to pay duties at the border.

Why, then, China let such massive in-flow of goods enter tax-free through its borders every day? Why not collect such duties and put them to good use, building schools and hospitals for the common people? By stepping up controls and imposing fines customs posts may greatly reduce the influx of people carrying out such illegal trade while protecting genuine tourists and visitors from China. There is no need of limit the visas, what it is needed is for customs officers to work harder and impose duties on goods where they are lawfully due, nothing else.

 

 

Macau, June 1945

Every night the streets of Macau teem with shadows, walking and stirring under the cold light of the moon. Families of refugees sleep with no shelter and no food. Trembling children grab their parents, scared by tales of men feeding on human flesh. The corpses of those who will not make it through the night will be picked up in the morning and buried in common pits on Coloane Island.                                                                Victor Li and Giovanni walked through the Rua de Palha under the Fortaleza de Saõ Tiago and then turned onto the Travessa de Sé, entering the Lou Kau. It had been the grand house of a dynasty of bankers before the war, but had been seized by Wong Kongkit and his wife, both feared gangsters working for the Japanese army. That house had been built with black volcanic stone that kept people cool and dry during the sweltering Macanese summers. Light was provided by large red lanterns with the characters of longevity painted in black brush strokes. Victor and Giovanni entered and went to the upper floor where a blind girl, wearing a cheongsam, was playing a quqing, a Chinese stringed instrument. At the end of the room was a table with a dozen people sitting for dinner, like in the Last Supper of Leonardo.

A waitress came to escort them into the dimly lit room and she noisily farted.

‘Oh, she lighted off her ass’ uttered Victor.

‘And what is that?’

‘Book of Joshua, King James Bible, you are Italian, you don’t know…’

‘There is our Fascist comrade!’ shouted a pale Chinese man in Portuguese.

A Japanese colonel stood up. He was Sawa, the feared commander of the Japanese garrison. He had a samurai’s sword at his side but he was too drunk from saké to stand up straight. He waved his hand trying a Fascist salute. Giovanni returned the salute and they sat down.

‘My boss suggests you taste this special fish’ said Victor.

‘Special?’

‘Tubarāo we call it. It is a carnivorous fish; the Pearl River is full of dead bodies floating down from Canton. It is delicious. Some saké?’

‘So, captain, tell me, how is Mussolini?’ demanded, blurring his words, the Japanese colonel, oblivious of the fact that Mussolini was killed two months earlier and the war in Europe was over.

‘He is fine, hiding in the mountains of North Italy, preparing to poke the Allies into their eyes.’

‘Their propaganda says he is dead, but we Japanese know better…’ he grinned.

Giovanni’s plan for his mission was to get to Hong Kong by boat and meet Franklin Gimson, the former first secretary in the British Colony and Colonel Charles Boxer. They were prisoners of the Japanese but a short meeting could be arranged at the military hospital on Bowen Road. To distract the enemy, the East River Chinese guerrillas would blow up a bridge in Argyle Street and distribute leaflets in the Central Market. Secret information had to be verbally communicated before the liberation of Hong Kong, just a few months away, according to the War Ministry. Americans wanted Hong Kong returned to China, but the British and the Chinese communists had other plans.

‘Now, some fun!’ shouted Wong Kongkit.

A man opened two baskets. A king cobra and a small mongoose crawled onto the floor. The reptile and the mammal stared at each other and were soon locked in a deadly fight. The cobra stoop up, hissing; the mongoose begun a light dance under the snake’s head. The guests were excitedly placing bets. This went on for five minutes until the cobra finally sprang forth; the mammal ducked and then sunk his sharp teeth into the cobra’s neck. People were booing the snake and threw chopsticks at the mongoose. She was not distracted in her determination until a gush of blood spilled out of the reptile’s neck. It was soon over and banknotes were thrown across the table.

‘A last drink with our comrade!’ said Sawa, he wanted to retire for the night with two young Chinese girls to keep him company, ‘Let’s have some vodka taken from the commies.’

Sawa had his eyes crossed but a waiter understood and poured the liquid in a porcelain bowl and mixed it with a pair of chopsticks. At that point the Colonel was just too drunk to wait. He pissed himself in his left leg, bowed and then left, leaving a wet trail on the wooden floor that mixed with the cobra’s blood.

‘Please, don’t shake it, just stir it!’ calmly said Giovanni to the waiter, then he looked out of the window in the direction of Hong Kong. He’ll have to get there tomorrow for another dangerous mission. His real name was Bond, James Bond and he was getting weary, perhaps because he had become wiser: the foolishness of his youth had somehow evaporated.

‘Great danger ahead but be killed at war’s end is dyeing twice. Can I stop the moon in the sky?’ he thought shivering ‘but fear not, neither be thou dismayed…aye…for He will smite our enemies and put their chariots on fire! And that’s also Joshua.’

 

From: Angelo Paratico BEN, Mursia, Milan, 2010.

Ungaretti and the crying dogs

Giuseppe Ungaretti (Alexandria of Egypt, 8 February 1888 – Milan, 1 June 1970) is one of the greatest Italian poets ever existed but the Anglo-Saxon world had not yet fully grasped his depth. Ungaretti’s character was shaped by the traumatic experiences he lived in the trenches, even if Italy had joined the fray only on 24 May 1915 (some say 23 May).

One hundred years ago Ungaretti was demonstrating in the streets for Italy to enter the war alongside France and Great Britain and against Germany and Austria. He was an interventista  and then, having reached his bloody goal, he volunteered and departed to the front.

During the war he scribbled 80 poems on a notebook and an officer and a friend, the poet Ettore Serra, being greatly impressed, had them printed in a small printing shop of Udine. Only 80 copies. The title was Porto Sepolto, or  Buried Port. They still are, in my opinion, the best things he had ever written, and if he was killed by a bullet during that war he would be famous anyway, perhaps even more famous. We will be musing on what he would have produced had he not met death in the flower of youth.

After the war he published another great collection of poems, which are seen as late fruits of the war, but the title tells of his change of attitude: L’Allegria dei Naufraghi or The Shipwreckeds’ Mirth

His poetry is known as hermetic a term used to indicate the fact that words are few and inscrutable but each of them weight tons. I remember him during his late appearances in the Italian TV – when I was a young boy – and his extraordinary way of reading his poems and the Odyssey: his voice was like a blade being grinded on a polishing stone. I have a strange portrait of him hanging in my home, with words he had written under it: ‘Giuseppe Ungaretti, disegno di Eugenio…’

I drop the bucket here, I have no intention of writing his biography but I am going to dedicate to him a hermetic poem that I wrote some time ago, and which was honourably censored just before publication.

I would have not thought about it for a second more had it not been censored by a friend. It is censorship that set it apart from the awful lot: it is a confirmation of balefulness, of ugliness & beauty.

The poems of Ungaretti are great because Ungaretti wrote them – not the proverbial monkey at the typewriter – with his life, his failures and successes, with all the books and articles he wrote with his hands and mind. They are Giuseppe Ungaretti.

 

Brotherhood

                                                                       (to Giuseppe Ungaretti)

In old China dogs were boiled in winter,

Other dogs cried, smelling the grievous air.

They were crying for their brothers,

Because death is real and life it is not.

Beauty will not save the world, imperfection will,

Imperfection is the supreme beauty.

God creates refined prose and the devil owns all mistakes,

For written by nobody and nobody wrote are equal.

 

Italy, March 1945. Seventy years ago

March 1945 marks the anniversary of the start of the Po Valley Offensive in Italy, which ended at the end of April with the surrender of 800.000 German soldiers and 300.000 Italian soldiers, all well equipped and armed. If these troops stationed in Italy would have followed to the letter the orders of Hitler, then the Italian campaign would have ended in a great bloodbath. They surrendered earlier than Germany (May, 8th) because of the secret talks carried out in Switzerland by Dr. Allan Dulles – the future head of the CIA – on one side, General Wolff of the Waffen SS and some Italians on the other. This had been code-named Operation Sunrise. Possibly Mussolini was in the know even if he pretended ignorance. And this, perhaps, may have been  the ultimate reason explaining his mysterious death. It is well known that the Americans wanted to capture Mussolini and have him tried in a Court of Law, while the British, with W. Churchill at their head, refused to comply  and wanted him shot on the spot.

Dr Deric Daniel Waters, could be called a living treasure of Hong Kong. He fought valiantly during the Second World War as a Desert Rat with the Eight Army in the famous combat in North African deserts and later fought alongside the American Fifth Army in Salerno and Anzio, Italy. He was mentioned in Despatches and wounded three times. After hostilities ceased he rejoined the family building business established by his great-grandfather in 1853. He then joined the Colonial Office of Britain and set sail to Hong Kong in 1954. He taught building technology and the related subjects in the Hong Kong Technical College that has since become The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. He was then made the Principal of the Morrison Hill Technical Institute in 1969 and transferred to the Government Education Department Headquarters in 1972 for planning and administration. He went on leave pending retirement from the Government in 1980. During the 1980s up to the present, he has written several  papers for the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Hong Kong Branch including the stories about CSM John Osborn VC, “Hong Kong Hongs with Long Histories and British Connections”, “Foreigners and Fung Shui”, “Chinese Funerals”,etc. He has also published his works through other mediums. Dr. Waters had declared in an interview: ” I was born in the city of pubs and churches.  There is a pub for every day of the year and there is a church for every week of the year, and that’s Norwich (England) in other words, a famous old city. During the war I joined the Eighth Army, I fought in the desert, I was wounded three times, superficially, not badly, but I still have shrapnel in my body. After Africa we went across to Italy, to Salerno. It was the first invasion during the war where the Allies met resistance.”

 

Once I exchanged letters with him on the South China Morning Post about the War in Italy, which caused so much destruction and pains on both sides. I had written that the invasion of Italy by the Allies had been a costly mistake, caused by British Prime Minister’s W. Churchill wanting to play the role of the great strategist. Churchill had  indeed many gifts but he did not possess the necessary coolness to be a great general. My statement understandably caused a reaction by Dr. Waters, he answered saying that the 1944 landing in Normandy could have not be carried out one year earlier, as General Marshal was proposing, and that Churchill had been a great leader. Here is my answer to Dr. Waters, which the SCMP did not publish:

I wish to thank Dr. Dan Waters for his kind answer to my letter (Failure not an option in 1944, June 20 2013) in which he points out that a D-Day landing in 1943 was not possible, as I did claim.  In fact it was planned in 1943 and the date set by General George C. Marshal and Eisenhower was April 1, then Churchill opposed it and the massed troops were diverted to Italy. Churchill’s decision to land in Italy, which he called “the soft belly of Axis”, achieved very little in terms of shortening the war with Germany, as the Allies discovered that the “soft-belly” was not so soft as they expected: this is due to the ridge of mountains, the Apennines, running through its length and the Alps on the North.  Furthermore between 1942 and 1944 military hardware productions in Germany increased by three folds in spite of the bombings and we should not forget that by 1943 there were not defences ready in Normandy: Rommel had not set up the Atlantic Wall defence system and the bulk of German divisions were still deep inside Russia. True that failure was not an option but no one can compare the tactical and strategic capabilities of General C. Marshal,  Dwight Eisenower and Albert Wedemeyer versus  those of a Winston Churchill, a fine speaker and a cunny politician, but a dilettante in war matters.

Let me quote a profile of W.C.  written by military historian F.F.C. Fuller in 1961 for his book “Conduct of War” but suppressed by his editor, fearing a sue for libel:

W. Churchill was a man of unlimited courage, he was possessed of brilliant but unstable intellect, and was erratically imaginative and profoundly emotional. A militarist to his fingertips, he loved war for his own sake, and yet, when soft emotion stirred him, tears would well up in eyes. As a stateman he was out of his depth, because so often he confused means and ends, and failed to realize that a statesman’s first task is to prevent war, and his second, should be this be impoissible, to bring war to a profitable and speedy end. As a strategist he was a calamity, and because of his pugnatious temperament and love of fighting, tactics fitted him better. But, unfortunately, the glamour of battle – most of which is apocryphal – so completely intoxicated him that killing of Germans became  his irresistible aim. Had he been  a corporal, this would have been his keeping, but it had nothing whatever to do with the duties of a Minister of Defence. The truth would appear to be that throughout his turbulent life he never quite grew up, and like a boy, loved big bangs and playing at soldiers

Moder historiography and the uncovering of new documents, which W.C had not been able to suppress, seem to point that in this suppressed passage there is a lot of truth. Even if, as usual, history is written by the victors.

 

 

 

Ettore Majorana was alive in Venezuela up to the late Fifties.

This is a story that reads like a Hollywood movie but which has been solved using modern scientific methods after a lead offered during a popular TV program called as “Who has seen him?” A format common to several countries and dedicated to the research of missing persons. In 2008 a man named Roberto Fasani called, speaking to the presenter and claiming to possess key information about Ettore Majorana, a famous Italian physicist who had mysteriously disappeared in 1938. The callers claimed to have left Italy in 1955 for Caracas, Venezuela, and then proceeded to Valencia, were he met a Sicilian friend called Cyrus who introduced to him a certain Mr. Bini. That white-haired gentleman looked like a prince to him: shy, living modestly and always sporting a sad air. He had a slight Roman accent but he was not Roman and he struck Fasani for his habit of keeping his wristwatch over, not under, the cuff of his shirt: then a common thing in Italy among the high class and the nobility – Majorana’s grandfather had been minister of Agriculture under Prime Minister Giolitti. Another man, called Carlo, later told Fasani: “You don’t know who he really his, he has a great head and his real name is Majorana.” He was not well off, as he seemed to possess only little money to pay for the gasoline of his car. In his car, a yellow Studebaker which he loved greatly, he was keeping folds of papers full of numbers and words which he was scribbling on. Fasani even spotted among those papers a postcard dated 1920 written by Ettore Majorana’s uncle, the physicist Quirino Majorana. Roberto Fasani added that it was not easy to convince Mr. Bini to have a photo taken but once, when he had asked him to borrow 150 bolivars, he convinced him to have in exchange of a photo together. Mr. Bini relented and the photo was taken, Fasani then thought to have lost it but it had appeared several years later and that was the reason why he was calling. He had a proof to back his claim!

After that TV program the Italian police decided to reopen that cold case and, basing on that photo, crossed with the image of Ettore Majorana’s existing photos and those of his father – a work carried out by the forensic section of the Italian police – on February 4, 2015 Rome Attorney’s Office, presided by judge Pierfilippo Laviani ruled that Majorana was still alive between 1955 and 1959. And he was living in Valencia, Venezuela, where he took the new surname of Bini. These last findings made the Judge declare the case officially closed, having found no criminal evidence related to his disappearance, which was probably due to his personal choice.

But who was Ettore Majorana?

Here is what his friend, Nobel Prize winner Enrico Fermi, said of him soon after he went missing:

There are several categories of scientists in the world; those of second or third rank do their best but never get very far. Then there is the first rank: those who make important discoveries, fundamental to scientific progress. But then there are the geniuses, like Galilei and Newton. Majorana did belong to the last category.

Ettore Majorana was born in Catania, Sicily, in 1906 into a rich family. As a child he was mathematically gifted, and when young he had joined Enrico Fermi’s team and became on the Panisperna Street Boys. This name derives from the street address where they set up their laboratory, close to the Coliseum, in Rome. He then earned a degree in physics at the University La Sapienza of Rome in 1929 and in 1932 he published a paper on atomic spectroscopy concerning the behaviour of aligned atoms in time-varying magnetic fields. This problem, also studied by Rabi and others, led to an important sub-branch of atomic physics, that of radio-frequency spectroscopy. At Fermi’s urging, Majorana left Italy early in 1933 with a grant from the National Research Council. In Leipzig, Germany, he met and worked with Werner Heisenberg, and during that same year, Majorana published a study on a relativistic theory of particles with arbitrary intrinsic momentum, in which he developed and applied infinite dimensional representation and gave a theoretical basis for the mass spectrum of elementary particles. Like most of Majorana’s papers in Italian, it languished in relative obscurity for several decades. Today the Majorana Equation and the Majorana Fermions are named after him even if he was known for never seeking credit for his discoveries, considering them just banal and worthless things. He had published only nine papers during his lifetime and left several unpublished papers.

By the end of 1933 he was back in Rome and in poor health, apparently suffering from nervous exhaustion. Putting up a strict diet he grew reclusive and severed all dealings with his family. We know that he loved to read Shakespeare in English and he was appearing at the University less frequently, for four years he scarcely left his home: the promising physicist had become a hermit!

On March 25, 1938 he left a note to Antonio Carrelli, Director of the Naples Physics Institute, asking to be remembered to his colleagues and saying that he had made an unavoidable decision and apologizing for the inconvenience that his disappearance would cause. This was followed by a telegram cancelling his earlier plans. He apparently bought a boat ticket from Palermo to Naples and was never seen again. After his disappearance at sea and despite several investigations, his fate remained uncertain because his body was never found. His friends and fellow scientists, like Amaldi and Segre, were sure he had committed suicide, even if he had apparently withdraw all of his money from his bank account prior to his fateful trip to Naples on March 26, 1938. Other thought that he may have defected to the Soviet Union, like in 1950 his colleague Bruno Pontecorvo, or that he may have become a monk. Even Benito Mussolini had personally put up a large money prize to find a solution of this riddle which was solved only last week.

We don’t know his motives for moving to Argentina and then to Venezuela but one historical coincidence which historians seem to have missed when dealing with Majorana’s disappearance is that on March 11-12 Adolf Hitler had occupied Austria, in what became known as the Anschluss. This was a shocking event for Italy and for the Fascist regime. Even Mussolini must have by then realised that he had created a monster and the monster was right at the border with Italy. Mussolini ordered to some infantry divisions to move close to the Austrian border but with France and Great Britain doing nothing and accepting the status quo he must had thought than no other option was left open to him but to try to get even closer to Hitler. These events could have shocked Majorana too for he must have thought that it was a game over for old Europe.

Perhaps with the collaboration of the Venezuelan government it could be possible to locate the grave of Mr. Bini and, if he had any relative left in Venezuela, his papers could be found stored somewhere in Valencia.

 

 

 

SCIENCE FOCUS

Science Focus: Italy closes case on physician’s mysterious disappearance

Prosecutor rules that physicist who vanished in 1938 was spotted in Venezuela two decades later

 

Ettore Majorana disappeared.Early this month, the judiciary in Italy officially closed the file on Ettore Majorana, whose sudden disappearance in 1938 marked one of the great mysteries in 20th century physics.

On February 4, Rome prosecutor Pierfilippo Laviani ruled that Majorana was still alive between 1955 and 1959 and was living in Valencia, Venezuela, under the assumed surname of Bini. Laviani declared the case closed, having found no criminal evidence in his disappearance.

Ettore Majorana was one of the greatest but least known 20th century physicists. Today his work is often cited alongside that of his friend, Enrico Fermi, who won the Nobel Prize for physics.

Fermi, one of the creators of modern physics and the atom bomb, said of his friend: “There are several categories of scientists in the world; those of second or third rank do their best but never get very far.

“Then there is the first rank: those who make important discoveries, fundamental to scientific progress. But then there are the geniuses, like Galilei and Newton. Majorana did belong to the last category.”

No one really knew what happened to Majorana in 1938 after he turned reclusive and then disappeared. Theories ranged from suicide to defection to the Soviet Union.

But a clue surfaced some seven years ago thanks to a popular Italian television show.

Who has seen him? follows a missing-persons format common in several countries. In 2008, Roberto Fasani called the show and claimed to have key information about Majorana.

He said he had left Italy in 1955 for Caracas, Venezuela, and then proceeded to Valencia, were he met a Sicilian friend who introduced to him a Mr Bini. That white-haired gentleman looked like an aristocrat, Fasani said. But he was shy, living modestly and had a melancholy air.

Someone told Fasani the man’s real name was Majorana. The camera-shy mystery man allowed himself to be photographed once. Fasani thought he had lost the photo but later retrieved it, he said, and that was why he was calling the TV show. Italian police reopened the case shortly afterwards.

Majorana was born in Catania, Sicily, in 1906 into a middle-class family. As a child he was mathematically gifted, and when young he had joined Fermi’s team. He earned a degree in physics at the University La Sapienza of Rome in 1929, and in 1932 he published a paper on atomic spectroscopy concerning the behaviour of aligned atoms in magnetic fields. This problem led to an important sub-branch of atomic physics: radio-frequency spectroscopy.

At Fermi’s urging, Majorana left Italy early in 1933 with a grant from the National Research Council. In Leipzig, Germany, he met and worked with Werner Heisenberg, and during that same year Majorana published a study on a relativistic theory of particles with arbitrary intrinsic momentum.

With this work, he developed a theoretical basis for the mass spectrum of elementary particles.

Like most of Majorana’s papers written in Italian, it languished in relative obscurity for several decades. But today the Majorana Equation and the Majorana Fermions are named after him. The equation is consistent with quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity.

This small output was enough to establish him as a giant of 20th century physics.

By the end of 1933 Majorana was back in Rome and in poor health, apparently suffering from nervous exhaustion. He grew reclusive and severed all dealings with his family. He loved reading Shakespeare in English. For four years he scarcely left his home.

On March 25, 1938 he left a note to Antonio Carrelli, Director of the Naples Physics Institute, asking to be remembered to his colleagues and saying that he had made an unavoidable decision and apologising for the inconvenience that his disappearance would cause.

This was followed by a telegram cancelling his earlier plans. He apparently bought a boat ticket from Palermo to Naples and was never seen again by his family and friends.

Angelo Paratico is a Hong Kong-based journalist and entrepreneur

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as Italy closes case on scientist’s mysterious disappearance